2006-08-08 04:14:37 · 16 answers · asked by david c 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
to bad people are to stupid to have seen that before he did this to us. Sorry to any one who supports him I am not bias for any means I am sure you have your reasons if you do support him
2006-08-08 04:19:14 · answer #1 · answered by Beverly 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not really a fan of Bush, but let's be honest, this country had debt before him and other presidents will create debt after him.
It's not like he's the first president to do things the American people don't agree with. Just remember, when we went to war, the American people supported it and to leave these countries before we've finished the job would be worse than if we never went in at all. Don't blame the President. He did what everyone else wanted him to do when he went into the war.
2006-08-08 04:21:29 · answer #2 · answered by just sam 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is the same stupidity that liberals used against Ronald Reagan back in the 80's - and it the strong defense system that Reagan had to rebuild after the Carter disasters was the reason that the Soviet Union and the Berlin Wall crumbled. It was also the reason why the 90's were so prosperous, but liberals will never have the guts or honesty or integrity to admit that...
We need to be spending a lot of money for the war on terror, and it will take a lot of money, resources, energy, and sacrifice to win this war. Liberals do not have the guts or the patience to fight this war, surrender and lining their own pockets on useless spending projects is what they want to do. We need to fight this war, and now... liberals would have this country in flames right now, if they only had the chance. No guts, no glory - and we will remain steadfast in our pursuit of victory, even if you liberals get to enjoy the fruits of the victory without any contributions to it. And you will keep whining and complaining about it all the while...
2006-08-08 05:22:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm a Bush supporter and not ashamed of him. I do not like the spending that happens at the federal level. Conservatives believe spending and decisions should be at their lowest level of government (city, county, state). In fairness, Bush does not "spend" since all appropriations bills originate from Congress. Secondly, the debt grew greatly during the 1980's. Reagan's economic plan lowered taxes and INCREASED revenue. But the spending by Dems who controlled Congress then was off the charts. We haven't had a surplus budget since. Even the supposed surplus under Clinton was a projected 5 and 10 year budget picture.
2006-08-08 04:22:19 · answer #4 · answered by nobody 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not at all.. I think many past presidents, especially the other party, have all contributed to our national debt. And guess what, the last president we had is to blame for the situation we are in in the Middle East because of his wavering to take a stand when he had the chance. I do say however, stop giving our money to people across the oceans, they do not appreciate it or repay in any way.
2006-08-08 04:22:42 · answer #5 · answered by beachcomber 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What good did Clinton do for this country besides screw Monica Lewinsky? Let's see, because of him the terrorists flooded the country. As for the debt, the economy was already going down long before Bush went into office! Clinton basically had no foreign policy. The only thing he knew how to do was screw interns!
2006-08-08 04:22:23 · answer #6 · answered by marieandlucaspape 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am a Bush supporter and I cringe at the growing debt of this nation. I will take Bush's cause of debt over the huge debt created by the Democrats and their insistence on social engineering and cradle to grave intrusions on all of our lives.
2006-08-08 04:21:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
they sure should be. and yeh other presidents put this country to debt...but not by so much! the dollar is so down, ive never seen anything like it. and to make matters worse, the dollars still dropping and is estimated to keep lowering. and, usa is hated more and more by other nations all because of this idiot president. o yeah, and its not actually the president putting the country in debt, because the president is a retarded ***, who couldnt put the country in debt even if he wanted to
2006-08-08 04:21:55 · answer #8 · answered by chikenboy 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As maximum will say, Bush substitute into President, inspite of the reality that the financial gadget substitute into in particularly good shape till the DEMS won back congress, amazingly very virtually that element the financial gadget began on a downward spiral. i does no longer be in any respect shocked if it got here to be established interior the destiny that the Democrats in congress orchestrated the give way of the financial gadget to confirm that a Liberal won the White dwelling house Now if Obama fails you will pay attention the word "A president can purely do plenty" and "it extremely is congress's fault" sure there's a double uncomplicated!
2016-11-04 03:15:58 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They SHOULLD be ashamed of themselves for supporting the Washington, DC terrorists, who planned the attacks on 9-11-2001, and all the crimes commited in the formerly good name of the United States, since then!!!!
Doc
2006-08-08 04:20:35 · answer #10 · answered by Arbuckle Doc 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What President hasn't put our country into debt?
2006-08-08 04:21:54 · answer #11 · answered by Lu 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋