English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-08-08 03:57:47 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

14 answers

Of course they would. Politicians are cowards.
when bush or rumsfeld or rice fly to Iraq, they are so afraid that they always plan it as a surprise. they are seriously like pussys, sending poor people to fight their wars.

2006-08-08 04:04:43 · answer #1 · answered by ff9_terra 2 · 0 0

Many of the politicians were young men, who did fight in wars. So the answer is no.

2006-08-08 11:03:35 · answer #2 · answered by Baby Bloo 4 · 0 0

Yup. But it's always been the rich man's war and the poor man's fight.

2006-08-08 11:09:55 · answer #3 · answered by Kiki 6 · 0 0

Of course not, because we'd only elect angry people to be politicians in case someone else attacked us.

2006-08-08 11:00:50 · answer #4 · answered by Mortis 3 · 0 0

some might have been prevented, though some probably not because some politicians were previously general or commanders.

2006-08-08 11:17:09 · answer #5 · answered by Karen 3 · 0 0

No. Wars are caused by organized religion.

2006-08-08 11:01:07 · answer #6 · answered by Pitchow! 7 · 0 1

It would be funny if we could settle things via a duel or a game of chess but it would never happen in todays world.

2006-08-08 11:04:10 · answer #7 · answered by ESPforlife 2 · 0 0

Probably all - I say probably because how to you compromise with a nut case like Ahmadinejad?

2006-08-08 11:10:16 · answer #8 · answered by TheHumbleOne 7 · 0 0

I like the way you think... or send there children

2006-08-08 11:00:53 · answer #9 · answered by Mom 5 · 0 0

That's funny.

2006-08-08 11:01:12 · answer #10 · answered by Pinolera 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers