ISN'T SO CONVENIENT FOR ALL SUPPORTERS OF ISRAEL TO USE THE WORD ANTI-SEMITIC AS THEIR ONLY ARGUMENt?

Question

WHEN ONE OPPOSES THE BOOD THIRSTY TACTICS OF THE ISRAELI GOVERNMENT THEIR SUPPORTERS HAVE ONLY ONE LABEL/WORD AS THEIR ARGUMENT.

WELL I AM NOT MUSLIM
I AM NOT RELIGIOUS
I AM NOT A TERRORIST
I AM AGAINST THE LOSS OF LIFE
I AM NOT AGAINST JEWS

BUT I AM AGAINST THIS NEO NAZI APPROACH OF THE ISRAELI GOVERNMENT THAT THEY SO CALL "DEFENSE"

HOW MANY PEOPLE WILL ISRAEL KILL FOR EVERY TWO KIDNAPPED?

HOW MANY WARS WILL THEY START?

AND HOW MUCH DO THEY REALLLY CARE FOR THEIR TWO MISSING SOLDIERS WHEN THEY JUST BOMB ANNYWHERE WITH NO PRECAUTION TO THAT?

THERE MUST BE AN ONE-WORD ARGUMENT TO ALL THIS...
SO LET'S HERE THOSE BLIND-SIGHTED SHEEP THAT FOLLOW AN IDEA WITH NO REAL THOUGHT ARGUE...

I guess for turboweegie RATIONAL ARGUING involves the word sheepf******. THANKS FOR MAKING MY POINT

ANOTHER GREAT ARGUMENT BY KEVI W

anyone who EVEN QUESTIONS killing by the Israelis is anti-semitic now!!!!! they did change the definitioon, and ii thought it was humanity...

reli ,, of course you don't have an argument.. you're here to see whhat soembody ellse cann think for you so that you can agree. you are indeed so close to the source of evil: ignorance, apathy, ironic attitude toward the death of fellow human beings..

Answer 1

You are aware that Israel has been invaded on 5 seperate occasions and has defeated nearly every arab country on the peninsula?

Answer 2

New World Order

Yes, it is very conveniant, but there is many things to know :

The problem is Zionists, not Jews.
Bush administration finance 1/3 of Israel war budget
Bush administration finance 1/2 of Israel military budget
This war would cease before diner, if W.Bush wanted it.
They are the New World Order. This is not the first forge.
They are the economy, the system, the Usa, and many other's countries...

This is all well planed. They want this war to happend, but i'm not sure they want a winner. They just want the war because ( it's very important ) :

A perpetual war (WW-3) make the economy turn, and produce,
without raising the level of life of the citizens, on both sides. Even lower it. And take of freedoms, pretexting war. This is the Martial Law. The Patriot Act. They want it world wide. They created this "right major crisis" they needed to make the planet accept the New World Order.

Please investigate, then you mught come to my blog, on my 360 page, then post any comment you feel. This is well documented :

Answer 3

Anti-democratic also comes to mind when describing the enemies of Israel. I, too am not religious, and I, too do not support the loss of life. Yet, I support Israel because they are a civilized democracy holding out against bloodthirsty, illiberal, attackers who are little better than barbarians. Kidnapping soldiers the soldiers was an act of war, and to say that Israel should not defend itself when another group makes war on it is to indicate that you have the intelligence of a rock. As for the civilian casualties, you once again skew the issue. Israel gave the Lebanese one week of warning before they began bombing residential areas. During this grace period, the civilians had ample time to evacuate their homes and get somewhere safe. If they are killed in a bombing, it is their fault for not heeding Israel's warnings. Israel does not want civilian casualties amongst its enemies, but it will not hesitate to do what it must to protect its own civilians from hezbollah terrorists.
Israel doesn't start wars, it finishes them. Every military operation that Israel has engaged in was provoked by her illiberal enemies, and I fully respect their determination to defend their people and their democracy, for far more people would die if people like Ahmadinejad were to take over Israel.

Answer 4

I'm not all that updated on this war b/c I don't watch the news that much, but I do know this. That when you add two kidnapped soldiers to two countries who are already fueding, you are pretty much asking for a war.
Everyone is talking like Lebanon is the victum here, but Hezballah is controlling Lebanon and the president over there tries to deny it, saying he doesn't know anything about terrorist acts in his own country! When, in actuality, he is being controlled by Hezballah and is scared to stand up against him.
And when Isreal sent their troops on the border of Lebanon and killed those civilians, they sent a flyer around Lebanon warning those people to LEAVE, b/c at midnight they were going to invade and anyone who would be there would be killed....so why were all those women and children there on the border around midnight??? I think Hezballah put them there, and forced them to stay, he's a terrorist, they use women and children and animals as shields and suicide bombers. Lebanon is the one who started this, now they want to back out. They should have never started something they couldn't finish.
And, just FYI, Isreal has NEVER lost a war. Even in the Biblical days, Isreal was God's chosen land, and chosen people. I think they are a strong force, and Lebanon should have taken all that into consideration before they decided to invade Isreali land and kidnap two soldiers. That's just my opinion.

Answer 5

First, most answers are given, and the people asking the questions are indeed anti-semetic.......second, why are you so worried about the Israelis? Do you know how many of their people have been kill by suicide bombers in their own country? Or why do you not compliaing about Hezbollah targeting civilians? You are saying you are against death....well, complain about everyone, not just Israel......and that is why the term Anti-semetic comes up....have you seen the videos of the missile launchers of Hezbollah being attacked? then you know they are next to house in neighborhoods, quite often...lastly, I can not recall one time that Israel has started a war, and I am much older than you, I suspect. they have always finished a war......They have never been the aggressor

Answer 6

WOW what a statement. I believe that Israel has every right to defend itself. If they did not respond they way they do when two soldiers are kidnapped, it would become 20, then 100, then 1000...Israel must crush Hezbollah, at any cost. If the so called civilians in Lebanon did what was right they would throw Hezbollah out of the country. A recent poll says that 92% of Lebanese people support Hezbollah. That says enough to me...bomb away...bomb away!!

Answer 7

Well, could it be that the people that support Isreal are none of thing as well. They are just sympathetic to their cause. They are a small nation surrounded by other nations that host militant groups that want to see their end. They have to take a stand. They have to show that even the smallest act of agression towards them will unleash a heavy retaliation. Why do you blame Isreal for this action? This is a reaction. Thus meaning a inital action had to take place to make this a reaction. Why do you not blame Hezbollah? Why do you not blame Hamas? Why do you not blame any of these militant groups for their actions? You only question the reaction of Isreal. Are they supposed to sit there and take everything that is handed to them? Why are we blind sided sheep for forming an opinion based upon the fact? Sorry you are not in the majority. I cannot help it that you do not feel that a nation as to defend itself at all cost even of the smallest encounters. Just because I symapthize with their problems and support their actions does not mean I blindly follow. Somehow you reached a descision to not support their actions. Well, who are your blindly following?

Answer 8

no longer unavoidably. If I see a submit of hers i visit decide on in keeping with what she says. The definition of antisemite is somebody who hates Jews so being a semite does not teach one cant be antisemitic. Even Jews might nicely be antisemites and a few are. Meir Kahane called them self hating Jews. Addition; mendacity that AIPAC supposedly has 'too plenty capability' whilst in fact they have virtually none (they are able to't even get usa to renowned Jerusalem as Israels rightful capital, wow what powerful capability they wield...no longer!!!) is antisemitism disguised as some thing else. And it has no longer something to do with unfastened speech by way of fact somebody asserting they hate Jews in basic terms for contemporary is likewise unfastened speech and in usa there isn't any regulation against it by way of fact it relatively is unfastened speech in spite of the incontrovertible fact that it continues to be antisemitic on a similar time as nevertheless being unfastened speech. And Jews are in maximum cases only as semitic as everyone else. yet lower back the term ANTI-Semite does not propose hatred of all semites only like homophobe does not propose hatred of all homosapiens.

Answer 9

There's a difference between disagreeing with the tactics of the government of Israel and hating Jews. Unfortunately, the supporters of Israel, especially here in the US, have come to use the "anti-semitic" card on anyone disagreeing with Israel in any way, even going so far as to bring up the Holocaust and Hitler. It just cheapens the memories, and reduces any argument to "you anti-semite!". Sooner or later, it's going to lose its power because of misuse and overuse.. :\

Answer 10

Yes. Its so true. Everyone who criticises Israel's foreign policy are anti-semites.
For example - Jews for Palestine and the Israeli organisation of Reservists who refuse to serve in the West Bank Yesh Gvuel - are all motivated by anti-semitism. Oh yes, very much so.

The 'all people who criticise Israel are anti-semites' argument is often as pathetic and ignorant as anti-semitism itself.

Answer 11

You can stop shouting any time now. Israel must defend itself because it can't afford to lose a war, not one while the Arabs can absorb humilating defeat after humilating defeat, (1948, 1956, 1967, 1973) and come back for more.
There is no such thing as a one-word argument among thinking people.