AND WHAT ABOUT HIS COMMENT "BRING EM ON" ....THAT GOT MY NEPHEW KILLED WAS THAT YOUR GOAL BUSH? YOU BASTARD!!!!
2006-08-06 15:26:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by tough as hell 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Hypocrisy. It truly isn't a prerequisite to be involved in warfare to declare war (although some very respected military leaders in the past have expressed their strong support for such a thought), but cowardly and greedy bastards are always the first to jump all over a chance to send soldiers to bomb the hell out of another country.
I honestly don't care what Bill Clinton did during the Vietnam War, neither do I care about what the cowardly rich spoiled brat did during that conflict, all I care about is our leaders obeying the laws of this land and respecting our international treaties while in office. BOOsh has done neither.
He gets away with it because his party won't question, impeach, nor punish one of their own for breaking the laws and there aren't enough brave Democrats in Congress to demand action or seek to hold these criminals accountable.
True Democrats are few and far between in Washington, D.C. these days, and that is so unfortunate.
2006-08-06 22:27:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by Daniel C 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Daddy bought his way through lots of things like college. When the truth is as well hidden as it is it is hard to prove, did you know that he has a DUI ticket in Maine, Proving he was an alcoholic, He is also rumored to be a coke head. But he and his daddy have no problem skating around the truth. Can you just immagine how stupid some of these people are to answer that he is brave. He has no morals.
2006-08-06 22:31:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
He was busy snorting cocaine in the reserves. He IS a bastard, coward, self-server and a complete punk! There is some dude selling toilet paper with his face on it on state street in SB, and I think that is the best tribute for DUHbya and his stupid presidency. Hope he steps down before 2008. I don’t think the country can handle 2 more years of his incompetence and this Business transaction he has labeled as a "war against terror". Hopefully that toilet paper I baught won't leave a permanent tattoo of his face on my azz.
2006-08-07 11:00:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's called an honorable discharge, Dr Feelme. Meanwhile, your boy, Wild Willey was chasing whores around in Europe draft-dodging. Why don't you address that?
Why don't you address your band-aid warrior pruneface hero being in the Communist War Hero Hall of Fame? It's does the democrat heart well to see a kid shot in the back, evidently.
2006-08-06 22:17:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
In all seriousness, no President is "eager" to send "others' kids to war". A President contemplates the risks and the sacrifices. I don't believe Bush is any different in that regard. We send men who have volunteered to serve to war. Not kids.
2006-08-06 22:34:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by nobody 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
His Dad and family bought him a lot of things, C's in high school, Getting into Yale!, With C's!, C's at Yale, getting into the national guard, the presidency.... you know just the stuff a caring father does.
2006-08-07 02:29:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by RATM 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because we allow CIVILIANS to control the military in this country. If you don't like that rule make it so only military men can run and hold office. How would you like that?
2006-08-06 22:22:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by solitas777 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
He didn't evade his duty, he was in the reserves. What about Kerry? He applied for his medals-how much weaker can you get than that?
2006-08-06 22:34:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by loubean 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your so diluted. You know being in a war is not a requirement to declare war.
2006-08-06 22:18:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by Ryan 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
who or what is duhbya i guess you are some retarded lib i guess if you mean Bush he was in the military he had no control where or when they send them to war
2006-08-06 22:56:09
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋