2006-06-19 10:43:46 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Health ➔ Men's Health
it is a personal decision that people make based on religion, or if the father is circumsized, or for medical reasons. It has been found to reduce the risk of infections later in life such as STDs. There really is no benefit or difference with sexual relations (i know from experience)...
2006-06-19 10:50:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
There is no benefit from being circumcised. In fact both the male and female lose some feelings when having sex with a circumcised male. When intact (not circumcised) the male has more nerves and feelings in his penis due to the foreskin still being there. The females also have just a little bit more girth to work with due to the foreskin retracting and making an extra layer of skin to make the penis thicker
as far as the hygiene argument in today's world it should not be a big deal for either mom or dad to teach young boys how to retract the foreskin and clean their penis
If people think it looks better cut then they must think they are better than GOD because he is the one who originally modeled man after himself
2006-06-19 11:32:58 · answer #2 · answered by K 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
More US women are willing to go down on you. A lot of American women are afraid of the natural look.
The medical benefits are just myths. Most modern studies of first world countries show no difference. The studies that show health effects are usually of places where hygene and medical care access are notoriously bad. It's amazing how many people still believe that it is somehow better to be circumcized.
2006-06-19 10:49:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Primarily hygiene. However in modern times and civilized cultures, it's less of an issue and imnsho not necessary. If you weren't supposed to have a foreskin then evolution would have done away with it...uncircumcised guys tend to be more sensitive in that area too...more reason to keep the turtleneck.
2006-06-19 10:46:29 · answer #4 · answered by . 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There is none! Keep the skin.
The internet has a load of pros and cons on this subject.
To begin with, they remove the thin sensual skin that you need for pleasure, instead of removing the thicker heavy skin near the base. That's like removing 80% of a woman's clitoris.
2006-06-19 10:48:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
If snipping skin off a man makes his penis easier to clean, then why stop there folks? Let's lop those ear and nose right off, and if those pesky lips weren't in the way, think of the optimal dental cleaning that can be attained?
2006-06-20 10:47:42 · answer #6 · answered by snarkymikey 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It reduces infection and also reduces the chance of a long-term sexual partner from getting cervical cancer. It also eliminates the (very small risk) of penile cancer.
Many women just prefer them this way, too. They are cleaner and better looking.
2006-06-19 10:50:18 · answer #7 · answered by neanah_e 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
From a medical point of view, it makes it easier to keep that area clean resulting in less chance of infection.
Also many women believe it looks better that way.
2006-06-19 10:48:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Being uncircumcised it grows longer & fatter!
http://www.total-knowledge.com/~willyblues/
2006-06-19 10:48:51 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's cleaner and better feeling for the ladies...
2006-06-19 10:53:51 · answer #10 · answered by slickkittykattwhopurs 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋