Politics - 13 October 2007

Just because she was dubbed as expert on soviet union she is now picking up trouble with Mr.Putin.

2007-10-13 15:33:28 · 5 answers · asked by Dr.O 5

I don’t think so he is a hypocrite and a lair and it was way way way to political of a reason to award him with it…

I think there should be a petition to strip him of the award personnel

2007-10-13 15:29:19 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

Using the current system which is in place with the federal reserve?

Everyone seems to arguing over whether this amendment was ratified, but what we should be looking at is this;

What is it going to take to remove the national debt from America???

Do not allow yourselves to be divided and conquered...whether ratified or not, the facts remain and the system is flawed.

Again, the real question;

What does everyone need to do in order to remove the national debt?

2007-10-13 15:14:43 · 14 answers · asked by lee h 3

about man made global warming, evolution, and the big bang just to make money?

That is one of the conspiracy theories cons use. The other one is that the vast majority of scientists who support man made global warming are socialists who want to destroy capitalism.

2007-10-13 14:51:02 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

...Peace Prize?

2007-10-13 14:43:07 · 24 answers · asked by Raging Hillbilly 3

... no ability for the gov't to pay it's deficit? No social programs at all, meaning social security and federal funds for education out the window? wtf???

Save your money people. Spend it were it counts (Gulianni). Paul will never get elected, even if he's the last human on earth; the animals will elect a llama instead.

2007-10-13 14:39:04 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

people because they now believe bush is the anti-Christ and that his act of mass murder was done in the hope that one of the 600,000+ killed would be the real Christ, thereby staving off the end-times.

If this movement continues to grow, what effect will it have on the GOP?

2007-10-13 14:39:01 · 11 answers · asked by Cody H 1

I think he's a genius.
I listen to his show on the radio almost everyday and he's great. He speaks the truth. He's the real deal.

2007-10-13 14:33:06 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

He has never voted to raise taxes.
He has never voted for an unbalanced budget.
He has never voted for a federal restriction on gun ownership.
He has never voted to raise congressional pay.
He has never taken a government-paid junket.
He has never voted to increase the power of the executive branch.

He voted against the Patriot Act.
He voted against regulating the Internet.
He voted against the Iraq war.

He does not participate in the lucrative congressional pension program.
He returns a portion of his annual congressional office budget to the U.S. treasury every year.

http://www.ronpaul2008.com/about/

2007-10-13 14:10:13 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-13 14:07:00 · 19 answers · asked by a bush family member 7

2007-10-13 14:06:25 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071014/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/us_russia_rice

notice that when the illuminati are dealing with big guys their actions are restricted to defamation and character assassination, with small guys they use force. This is how bullies operate - they never attack someone who can defend themselves.

2007-10-13 13:59:05 · 7 answers · asked by Z 1

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071013/ap_on_re_mi_ea/sanchez_iraq

If he was praising how good the Iraq war going, would this news last even 2 minutes in Yahoo News?!

2007-10-13 13:58:39 · 15 answers · asked by Samm 6

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20071013171901AAwLehH&r=w&pa=FZptHWf.BGRX3OFMiDZWUiZt0d.Q8IRrvsxAjmHygTBpr7XpNA--&paid=answered#Q4dSGE_2WE.NnYXfeLvi

2007-10-13 13:36:42 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

is that a fair compromise?

people would still be able to protect their homes from invaders

it would be difficult/impossible for criminals to rob people on the street, burgle homes (because the rifle is so big)

the sickos who like to kill animals for fun will still be able to kill for fun

no concealed weapons on the streets

2nd amendment isn't violated. you still have a right to bear arms.

less crime, of course

the list goes on and on. of course there would have to be some exceptions, like law enforcement. they would still be allowed handguns and SWAT would still be allowed the more powerful guns.

2007-10-13 13:19:01 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous

gov't job training programs, for using government to fight poverty, pensions for the elderly, safety nets for the blind and lame, and be against the death penalty and still be a "classical liberal"?

============
TAX ONLY THE RICH
"We are all the more reconciled to the tax on importations, because it falls exclusively on the rich, and with the equal partition of intestate's estates, constitutes the best agrarian law.. Our revenues once liberated by the discharge of the public debt, and its surplus applied to canals, roads, schools, etc., and the farmer will see his government supported, his children educated, and the face of his country made a paradise by the contributions of the rich alone, without his being called on to spare a cent from his earnings."
--Thomas Jefferson to Thaddeus Kosciusko, 1811. ME 13:41
http://www.constitution.org/tj/jeff13.txt

2007-10-13 13:17:13 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

do you know any other ones?

2007-10-13 13:14:40 · 14 answers · asked by macmanf4j 4

When women (and quite a number of them) made claims of sexual misconduct towards President Clinton, Hillary refered to them as "Bimbo Eruptions."

While I understand she might have been conflicted in the matter, didn't she abondon her principles by not supporting these women?
How can she now say she supports other women when they make claims against other men?
Is this another example of Liberal double standards?

2007-10-13 13:13:10 · 11 answers · asked by prancinglion 5

I vote Hilary Clinton vs. Al Gore!

2007-10-13 13:10:31 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

You know, I am so sick and tired of this Liberals are "anti-American" BS. How am I anti-American? I love my country and I only want what is best for America. I support my troops, I mean my own cousin is in Iraq, but this war was not based on the truth. We did not find what we were looking for but we continued to stay there. I am not sure what our government was thinking at that time... that we could completely wipe terrorism out of Iraq without finishing the job in Afghanistan? We also let our attackers get away into Pakistan where they are building strength because no one can get them there. We had no real goal there and now that we realized we made a mistake we just need to clean it up the best we can and leave. This is what 70% of Americans think and this is what I think. Conservatives who are for this war, what is SO wrong about the simple acknowledgment of these facts, just because they prove that things are not as dandy as you want them to be? Are all Americans who want the troop

2007-10-13 13:04:31 · 13 answers · asked by Lindsey G 5

didn't our gov't admit to have tested the effect of radiation on school children?!
didn't they experiment on their African American soldiers by infecting them with syphilis?
Iran/contra scandal? Oliver North said it was a fact; didn't he?
please give me more examples:

2007-10-13 13:01:00 · 8 answers · asked by macmanf4j 4

Have you read his speech --- June 5, 1944?

It should be required reading of every American --- especially every Liberal.

Today's liberals would have court-marshalled him to private for making the greatest speech in history.

2007-10-13 13:00:52 · 10 answers · asked by junglejoe 2

Americans' patents are worth over $55 trillion.

2007-10-13 12:58:24 · 11 answers · asked by a bush family member 7

I'm talking about 205,000 Iraqis killed during the Gulf War, after U.S. Ambassador April Glaspie told Saddam the U.S. had no position on his conflict with Kuwait.

I'm talking about 1 million Iraqis who died from preventable disease and starvation due to sanctions. Only the U.S. and Britain refused to lift these sanctions, even though Iraq had already destroyed its WMD and complied with the UN ceasefire.

And I'm talking about the 655,000+ dead in Bush's unprovoked war of aggression, which violates the UN charter and US and international law.

Somebody in the future is going to have a lot of apologizing to do.

2007-10-13 12:55:45 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

what about the liberals? ....

2007-10-13 12:52:40 · 11 answers · asked by nicollette 2

Under international law, isn't the occupying force (the U.S.) responsible for the defense of the occupied country (Iraq).

But as NATO allies, aren't the U.S. and Turkey forced to come to each other's aid?

2007-10-13 12:50:21 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

This goes for both cons and libs. Is it common to elect officials who so blindly vote on life and death issues?

2007-10-13 12:49:47 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

Isn't this country all about freedom? Isn't a liberal a liberated or a freed person?
So why is it so wrong or so hard to deal with that there are Liberals in our liberated country?
Isn't an American motto: Life, LIBERTY and the pursuit of Happiness. Not Life, CONSERVATISM, and the persecution of Happiness.
Why are Conservatives soooooo judgemental, yet said to be Christians? Don't strict Christians believe that God is the only one to pass judgement?
Enlighten me Conservative believers out there. I am an American with an open mind and I am willing to take your non-rude answers.
Eternal Blessings to all.

2007-10-13 12:45:05 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-13 12:37:40 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-13 12:32:18 · 24 answers · asked by Shal 1