English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics - 12 September 2006

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Politics

If a woman is raped in Pakistan, she has to have 4 adult male Islamic witnesses to prove it. If she doesn't, she will be held for up to 2 years without bond or trial, for adultery. Why doesn't the UN, or the US for that matter, get involved with these blatant human rights violations? When does freedom of religion get in the way of human rights, and when do you step in?

2006-09-12 04:21:46 · 11 answers · asked by hichefheidi 6

Not bloody likely in Iraq, eh?

2006-09-12 04:21:18 · 17 answers · asked by john b 1

You think I'm joking, well i'm not, according to some people on this forum, everything that the Bush admisitration had to deal with from 9/11 to the War in Iraq and the National Debt being so high, it was Clintons fault. So if Clinton was at fault for the Iraq War, according to some of the people on this forum, what should we do?

2006-09-12 04:13:59 · 16 answers · asked by Enterrador 4

A muslim teacher was was beaten to within an inch of his life by his fellow muslim brothers for hoisting the Tricolour on Independence Day. What, pray should the poor teacher have hoisted on Independenc Day?

2006-09-12 04:13:26 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

The Iraqis allow GWB to hold their purse strings? Have they not learnt from us? Record deficit, spending out of control, The military complex ever growing.. I see a bankrupt Iraq after this war has finished.

2006-09-12 04:01:23 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

I'm not saying I'm not happy about the situation but hes being talked about more and more as the lovable **** up now rather then a world leader? is this true in other areas of the world or just my little part?

2006-09-12 03:54:02 · 20 answers · asked by annubis 2

"Stay The Course" to a bankrupt nation?
"Stay The Course" to a terrorized nation?
"Stay The Course" to the death of soldiers?
"Stay The Course" to no progress in Iraq?

What does "Stay The Course" mean?

2006-09-12 03:45:21 · 16 answers · asked by Enterrador 4

http://www.thespoof.com/picstore/thespoof/davidbaker_mad%20bush.jpg

2006-09-12 03:42:02 · 3 answers · asked by Spadesboffin 3

Lawyers for Slick Willy Clinton penned a letter to ABC on Friday demanding that the network correct what they consider "fiction" regarding 'The Path to 9/11' docudrama or decide not to broadcast it.

They can sit silent during such fictional and misleading garbage as "Fahrenheit 9/11" but when someone -- especially their beloved Hollywood -- dares to take another tack, and one based on FACT, they resort to what they do best: WHINING!

Some people trash Bush as though they could do a better job as president (laughable), but God forbid any of the loony left ever get back in that office. Bill Clinton is more responsible for 9/11 than anyone alive save bin Laden himself. The Republicans may not be doing everything right (illegal immigration and worrying about what the world thinks instead of dropping an iron hammer on Iraq, for example), but at least they are DOING something.

Does anyone seriously doubt we would have been attacked again after 9/11with Democrats in charge?

2006-09-12 03:39:25 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

What do you think is wrong with them.It blows my mind that anybody will still support him

2006-09-12 03:33:44 · 33 answers · asked by RX 5

This is after the failure of men

2006-09-12 03:26:06 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

Does that injunction mean: "If you must wage war -- if it is impossible to avoid war -- then you stand a better chance of winning by being tricky"? Or does it mean: "Thou shalt wage war, and thou shalt deceive"?

e.g: Today's foiled attacks against U.S. embassy in Syria!

2006-09-12 03:25:11 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

Yup, Stalin hated Jews and God and the followers of God, and believed the government had to run peoples' lives. Opponents were worthy only of death. He was the ultimate liberal.

Hitler would never have overrun Europe if he had been confronted with conservative governments instead of the liberal governments of England and France in the 1930's. Those liberal governments were afraid of war and let Hitler take over countries and arm himself to the teeth, lest people get hurt if they didn't do what Hitler wanted. They also believed that if they loved Hitler, then Hitler would love them back and everybody would have a love-in and there would be world peace.

Hitler himself showed many traits of liberals - hatred of Jews, control of the people by the government...


99% of the world's misery is caused by liberals.

2006-09-12 03:21:13 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

They are closer to us than Iraq. The leader is hostile to us. Shouldn't we be afraid? Maybe they'll attack us. Should we attack them before they have a chance to attack us? Maybe they have WMD.

2006-09-12 03:20:18 · 10 answers · asked by Dastardly 6

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=ApYHFSNF83Qvlxpnsq.PaVTzy6IX?qid=20060912064053AAoK3MB

2006-09-12 03:18:53 · 16 answers · asked by Super Shiraz 3

For all you Clinton lovers who say personal life doesn't matter if it doesn't affect job, can now see that it did, in fact have an effect on his job, and ultimately 3000 people (r.i.p.) Anybody brave enough to admit to this now?

2006-09-12 03:17:34 · 13 answers · asked by klarf 3

"Whatever mistakes have been made in Iraq, the worst mistake would be to think that if we pulled out, the terrorists would leave us alone" <---Would this be the case if we had never invaded Iraq?

"They will not leave us alone. They will follow us. The safety of America depends on the outcome of the battle in the streets of Baghdad." <-- Does this mean that if we pull out of Iraq, the Iraqis will come to America and start a new war in our streets?

"I am often asked why we are in Iraq when Saddam Hussein was not responsible for the 9/11 attacks," Bush said. "The answer is that the regime of Saddam Hussein was a clear threat. <---Iraq needed a Regime change? Wasn't it a based on false information? Doesn't China, North Korea, Cuba, and Iran need a regime change? If I remember correctly, the war was based on WMD's, why is the justification now a Regime Change?

2006-09-12 03:16:59 · 13 answers · asked by Special Olympian 1

More than 160 million people in India are considered "Untouchable"—people tainted by their birth into a caste system that deems them impure, less than human.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/06/0602_030602_untouchables.html

Human rights abuses against these people, known as Dalits, are legion. A random sampling of headlines in mainstream Indian newspapers tells their story: "Dalit boy beaten to death for plucking flowers"; "Dalit tortured by cops for three days"; "Dalit 'witch' paraded naked in Bihar"; "Dalit killed in lock-up at Kurnool"; "7 Dalits burnt alive in caste clash"; "5 Dalits lynched in Haryana"; "Dalit woman gang-raped, paraded naked"; "Police egged on mob to lynch Dalits".

The most ignored and worse injustice inflicted upon man.

Until India combats this issue, there is no reason why the rest of the world should not see India as a racist hotspot and not fit for democracy.

2006-09-12 03:08:50 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

Tampa woman who lost eight relatives in the attacks converts to Islam as tensions simmer from the memories and new terror plots.

http://www.sptimes.com/2006/09/08/Tampabay/Faith_s_friction.shtml

Her mother named her Elizabeth after the queen of England. More than four decades later, she took another name: Safia Al-Kasaby, reflecting her new identity as a Muslima.

Safia, 43, is an unlikely candidate for conversion. She claims Jewish and Puerto Rican ancestry. She is a former sergeant first class in the Air Force National Guard. And she lost eight relatives — one uncle and seven cousins — in the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center.

She found Islam in 2005 on the third day of a Moroccan vacation.

“I just felt like God was there,” she said, recalling her visit to a mosque during the call for prayer. “I said, 'This is it. I believe there is only one God. His name is Allah, and his messenger is Mohammed.’”
...

2006-09-12 02:59:57 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

What do you think of this;

"Views of US

The US edges out Russia for the dubious distinction of having the largest number of countries rating it as having a negative influence in the world, with 15 countries saying it has a negative influence and just 6 countries viewing it as positive.

On average, a plurality of 47 percent view US influence in the world as mostly negative, while 38 percent view it as mostly positive and 15 percent did not answer either way. The countries most negative towards the US are Argentina (65%), Germany (64%), Russia (63%), Turkey (62%), Canada (60%) and Mexico (57%). Majorities see US influence as positive in the Philippines (88%), South Africa (56%), India (54%), Poland (52%), and South Korea (52%). A plurality of Italians (49%) are also positive."

Since all those countries have a negative opinion of us - shouldn't we be afraid of them? Maybe they'll attack us. Should we pre-emptively attack them before they have a chance to attack us?

2006-09-12 02:58:34 · 7 answers · asked by Dastardly 6

Mao Tze-tung, founder of Chinese communist party ordered the purge of 50 million people.

Stalin, leader of Russian communist party ordered the purge of 25 million people (2 times more than Hitler).

2006-09-12 02:58:10 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://www.nindy.com/bush/cant_trust_bush.gif

2006-09-12 02:56:21 · 16 answers · asked by Dr.Feelgood 5

2006-09-12 02:45:31 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

Sardar Patel is the greatest Indian politician. He is the most important man for freedom. He is the most honest person. His work is speaking. he is Bharat Bhagya Vidhata.

2006-09-12 02:44:22 · 8 answers · asked by Indian K 1

2006-09-12 02:35:54 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous

fedest.com, questions and answers