Politics - 11 September 2006

When I ask a question pertaining to politics the liberals all use PERSONAL ATTACKS. They cannot debate issues or understand that we conservatives do not understand their way of thinking.
Mention Hollywood weirdos that are libs and they go nuts.
Did you ever notice that...

2006-09-11 14:33:12 · 32 answers · asked by Anonymous

I was told not to tell. Im to stupid to keep secrets.

2006-09-11 14:29:38 · 36 answers · asked by Anonymous

Terrorist organisations such as Al Qaida have always based the motives of their terrorist attacks on America and her allies on what they feel are unjust American Foreign Policies.

Do you feel that if America were to change it's policies towards foreign countries from the current rather (not completely) imperialistic policies (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperialistic - first sentence is a good basic definition) to a less aggressive and pacifist role, the threat of future terrorism against her would be reduced.

Please take into account:

1) Radicalisation usually occurs when people want a means of fighting against what they see as injust.
2) The (apparantly claimed) aims of terrorist orgaisations.
3) Without political ammunition against America, terrorist organisations would find it harder to recruit bombers etc.

I realise the blurb gives away what I feel about the situation, but I am very interested in all balanced and intelligent answers.

2006-09-11 14:29:21 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

WASNT IT GREAT SEEING ALL OF THE REPLAYS AGAIN OF THE ATTACKS?? IT MADE ME AND MY LIBERAL GAY FRIENDS SOOOO HOT!!

BURN A FLAG---BE GAY---SUPPORT TERRIOST---BE A PROUD LIBERAL TODAY!!!

2006-09-11 14:26:52 · 20 answers · asked by Simms 2

My reference is to global terrorism which is primarily because of American imperialism

2006-09-11 14:23:52 · 14 answers · asked by Pear 1

It was NY's mayor who had to provide leadership to the country, while Bush cowered in hiding.

2006-09-11 14:19:51 · 33 answers · asked by Phil S 5

did are president do it for you tonight.
i'm a proud american but a little tried of hearing the same thing
every time. no more talk about weapons of mass destruction.
good bless america and are troops !!!!!!

2006-09-11 14:18:15 · 18 answers · asked by native 3

This wasn't supposed to be a political speech, but 65-70% of this BS is about Iraq, not honoring the vitims of 9/11. I can't say anymore. This is dispicible, using 9/11 as a mid term bulid up for the neocons. I will throw up now.

2006-09-11 14:16:35 · 17 answers · asked by FootballFan1012 6

2006-09-11 14:14:28 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous

NOW THAT WOULD BE AN ENJOYABLE SPEECH.

2006-09-11 14:13:58 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060912/ap_on_re_us/voter_identification

Previously the court had denied an injunction to stop it, but hadn't ruled on the merits. Now it is official.

I think this is just common sense, that if federal law requires people to be citizens, states can require proof of that. However, it is a major case, all the same.

What do you think?

2006-09-11 14:09:40 · 6 answers · asked by DAR 7

Bush is the only president to really go after Osama Bin Laden and his nut friends

2006-09-11 14:09:27 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

analysts have said many reasons why it happend but im never convinced with any of them so please share with your opinion

2006-09-11 14:05:58 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous

Please no answers like "Because he just is" or something like that. Didn't he graduate from Yale and Harvard Business School? And don't you like have to be smart to do that? I'm just wondering because everyone says that he is dumb, is it because he fumbles his speeches?

2006-09-11 14:04:16 · 31 answers · asked by Cute Little Bunny 1

2006-09-11 14:03:46 · 27 answers · asked by Clam 1

if Ronald Reagen and Bill Clinton knew about bin Laden wht does everyone blame Bush

2006-09-11 14:01:33 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-11 14:00:06 · 18 answers · asked by dstr 6

refresh before answering)

alot of people on this site seem to think i have a problem with the soldiers in iraq because i said that rape and murder of innocent women and children are a daily occurence, i don't, this is a problem caused by certain individuals and i said it because nothing was being done about it at that time. my problem is with the american goverment and those who are too ignorent to judge information from a third party, or others who are merely triing to inform people of what they know. i do not have a problem with those who support the goverment even if they have taken the time judge this information, not just dismiss it for what ever reasons they may have. i do not believe that the war in iraq is legitimate in any way, however this does not reflect my opinion of the men and women fighting in iraq, they are sent there and execute orders, they have no choice at that point. most of these people are honorable, courageous individuals, whome i have alot of respect for

Additional Details

23 minutes ago
my questions are, why don't people take the time to read thru these documents are such evidence before coming to a conclusion? why do people dismiss this as liberal propaganda evry time? and finally why do people get upset when i ask these questions even in the most polite manner i possibly can, just because they know my opinion?

20 minutes ago
the most important thing is:


why don't these people actually try to explain why it is they support the war anyways?

why don't these people try to explain their political point of views instead of claiming that i am a lib., (i am not even an american citizen, i do not support kerry, or any other person in particular, i just have a problem with bush) ?

2006-09-11 13:56:02 · 12 answers · asked by sikn_shadow_420 3

all i hear is negativity and quite personally id vote for him again.hes doing what needs to be done.

2006-09-11 13:55:39 · 16 answers · asked by heretohelp 2

Educated? How?

2006-09-11 13:53:49 · 20 answers · asked by Ah Ha 4

After your answer please post if you are a liberal or conservative.

2006-09-11 13:53:39 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-11 13:53:06 · 13 answers · asked by Ah Ha 4

Come on, nobody wanted to give it up last night, but I want to see who is arguing with who. Nobody should be ashamed of who they are, especially if you are going to spout out what you do... don't you think?

2006-09-11 13:52:00 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

Whether you agree or disagree with them.

I'm voting for DeuceRider or LeoGirl.

I haven't seen anything but spleen venting from either of them...

2006-09-11 13:46:09 · 3 answers · asked by Dastardly 6

2006-09-11 13:43:59 · 8 answers · asked by ast5792 1

2006-09-11 13:43:18 · 13 answers · asked by t c 3

400 families from that day charged the Bush Admin for obstructing the investigation, having prior knowledge and for "planning" the attacks.. this is not conspiracy banter.. funny how the major media doesn't define this as "news"..

http://www.nancho.net/911/mariani.html
http://www.meria.net/subscribers/interviews/stanley_hilton_9-11_lawsuit.html
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2003-07-13-911-families-cover-usat_x.htm
http://www.rense.com/general57/aale.htm
http://www.senate.gov/~schumer/SchumerWebsite/pressroom/press_releases/PR01276.html
http://www.oilempire.us/hilton.html
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/05/21/1450247
http://truthseeker.wordpress.com/2006/02/07/government-insider-says-bush-authorised-911-attacks/

want more ?

2006-09-11 13:42:18 · 22 answers · asked by hardartsystems 3

He will be my running mate! Hell yeah baby!

2006-09-11 13:37:05 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

i shouldn't be surprised, but the politics section is lacking objectivity. people are pretty uneducated about their opinions. i'm going back to "horoscopes."

2006-09-11 13:30:12 · 12 answers · asked by t c 3

PROGRAM ON ABC?

2006-09-11 13:28:34 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous