Politics - 10 September 2006

By pollster I mean the person who distributes and processed the polls.

2006-09-10 13:14:49 · 6 answers · asked by :)sml*now*cry*:(later* 1

2006-09-10 13:14:39 · 9 answers · asked by caity 1

2006-09-10 13:14:06 · 16 answers · asked by po8t1 2

2006-09-10 13:13:30 · 9 answers · asked by cassandra 6

What was former Clinton Nationa security advisor doing with those classified 9-11 Terror memos stuffed down his pants. We know he was sentenced for his part but what was he hiding and did he return the originals????? HMMMMM
Was this another democrat scandal or Clinton national security theft...
Where is Michael Moore now?

2006-09-10 13:10:43 · 13 answers · asked by michael s 2

personnally i hate him he sucks as a president

2006-09-10 13:10:43 · 25 answers · asked by HoTtIe_WiTh_a_BoDy 2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2W1FZWML6wA

2006-09-10 13:07:52 · 3 answers · asked by dstr 6

Only by fighting to do so. Only by waging their struggle against oppression -- oppression by those who tell them they are unfit to govern. Only by fighting for democratic power do they educate themselves and raise themselves up to the level of being able to wield that power. There has never been any other way for any class.

They're doing it in Venezuela, I am not dreaming, look it up. Lets go USA! 2006, 2008!

2006-09-10 13:05:18 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-10 13:00:47 · 24 answers · asked by misspiggy1287 1

And that stench of garbage would go away too?

2006-09-10 12:43:38 · 37 answers · asked by Anonymous

maybe hollywood and vine....wake up wake up

2006-09-10 12:30:23 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-10 12:13:54 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

Anyone putting more or less than 5 words is a moron.
And be honest with them 5 words of yours...Thanks

2006-09-10 12:13:52 · 43 answers · asked by GodBlessAmerica 1

what do you think and why? which powers in specific do you think each should have?

2006-09-10 12:13:39 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

September 11, 1990 -- President Bush calls the Gulf War an opportunity for the New World Order. In an address to Congress entitled Toward a New World Order, Mr. Bush says: "The crisis in the Persian Gulf offers a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times...a new world order can emerge in which the nations of the world, east and west, north and south, can prosper and live in harmony....Today the new world is struggling to be born."


Is it possible the New World Order was born 11 years to the day on September 11, 2001?

2006-09-10 12:13:04 · 22 answers · asked by latenewsbreaking 1

If not, should a country not even go to war in first place?

2006-09-10 12:10:33 · 12 answers · asked by Kuntree 3

you feel guilty all the time..admit it and clean up your act

2006-09-10 12:06:53 · 34 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-10 12:03:18 · 18 answers · asked by Ah Ha 4

be honest with your answers

2006-09-10 12:01:55 · 10 answers · asked by GodBlessAmerica 1

And if so who for (please tell me your state of residence)?

My voting plans (Wisconsin):
8th congressional: Steve Kagen
Govenor: Jim Doyle

2006-09-10 12:01:37 · 20 answers · asked by Tofu Jesus 5

Capitalism and other kids stuff -

Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hentIFNmZFo
Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3oPrYeWTpc
Part 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1kDoRo6wRY
Part 4: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXMnQ6Sp04o
Part 5: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CGEFzSAW3Q

2006-09-10 11:55:53 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

One view: "We can set the minimum legal wage to be whatever we want it to be! We don't have to stop at $8, or $10, or so. We could mandate something that guarantees a certain standard of living at 40 hours/week, perhaps $25/hr.

The trick is, though, that while we can set the minimum wage, what we can't set is the minimum value of an hour's worth of work. We can't control the return a business gets on the investment of hiring an employee (paying the wages, paying the unfriendly-to-job-creation payroll taxes, following the countless laws and regulations on employers).

So the problem should be immediately visible: If we set the minimum wage at a certain point, then all jobs whose value is below that value get destroyed. Instead of raising wages for the minimum-wage people, you kick them out of work.

And that's why youth unemployment is sky-high in liberal-infested cities: 'living wage' laws guarantee it." -by Neil Stevens

Survey was shown in this book:
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0324319169?v=glance

2006-09-10 11:50:31 · 20 answers · asked by slyry75 3

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060910/ap_on_re_mi_ea/israel_palestinians

2006-09-10 11:42:29 · 3 answers · asked by slyry75 3

John kerry or my dog?

2006-09-10 11:38:54 · 18 answers · asked by Ah Ha 4

The operation was called 'Operation Northwoods', it was a plan to generate public support for military action against cuba. The plan were to hijack planes and detonate bombs in USA and Cuba and blame it on Fidel Castro. I admit at the time it was a good idea to get rid of Castro as his regime was violent and brutal. However is it justified for themselves to kill thousands of US citizens? and then blame it on Castro? Just to generate support for what they wanted. Please US citizens tell me how you feel that the people who you voted in and is their job to protect you are planning to kill citizens to make people believe what they want.

2006-09-10 11:31:14 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-10 11:23:00 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

At first personally i didn't think they could have, although they have the technology and know how to easily organise the atacks, my main problem in not believing the 9/11 conspiracy theories were that could the bush administration really kill thousands of US citizens just to have access to more oil? It seemed ridicouous, however recently i viewed some information on something called 'Operation Northwoods' where the US government were gonna commit acts of terrorism across the states so that they would have public support for military intervention in Cuba. The president and senior military officals were all for it. So it got me thinking if they were prepared to commit terrorism in 1962, could they have organised the 9/11 attacks? There is more than enough evidence that they at least knew the attacks were going to happen, intelligent people please give me your views. thanks.

2006-09-10 11:16:52 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-10 11:13:11 · 51 answers · asked by sally_anne_66 1

Al Gore may not have been at his most polished state for the last election, but since then he has become a very prominent leader and a valuable role model.

Is he running? I haven't heard. If it did though, would you vote for him? Of course there is your alternative (H. Clinton).

2006-09-10 11:09:48 · 16 answers · asked by whatispunk 2

Do gay whales deserve to be treated the same as straight wales you decide!!!

2006-09-10 11:01:41 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous