English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics - 10 September 2006

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Politics

With the establishment of the facts that Iraq was not developing nor in possesion of WMD and that Iraq was not in league with Osama and his band of insane fanatics; does this then imply that USA could also have irresponsible and fanatic leader that would endanger the world as much as we fear the rise of fanatic leaders in the Muslim world ?

2006-09-10 17:41:48 · 14 answers · asked by Kee 2

or true american?

2006-09-10 17:27:26 · 15 answers · asked by bush-deathgrip 1

how many investigations did the pugs have against clinton?

2006-09-10 17:22:53 · 23 answers · asked by bush-deathgrip 1

2 more years of superstupidity

2006-09-10 17:20:04 · 16 answers · asked by bush-deathgrip 1

Bush on the Constitution:
By DOUG THOMPSON
Dec 9, 2005, 06:39

"Mr. President," one aide in the meeting said. "There is a valid case that the provisions in this law undermine the Constitution."

"Stop throwing the Constitution in my face," Bush screamed back. "It's just a goddamned piece of paper!"


"I don't give a goddamn," Bush retorted. "I'm the President and the Commander-in-Chief. Do it my way."

2006-09-10 17:16:15 · 10 answers · asked by bush-deathgrip 1

why do some politicianswair fake moustaches. who do they think they are, I mean come on. is it for good luck or do they just think facial hair however fake it might be looks good in the public eye.

2006-09-10 17:11:38 · 9 answers · asked by poopdeck 1

Ok, I am all for healthy skepticism, but what the heavens is going on with all of this nonsense emails from some of my fellow Yahoo! Answers about Aliens and Reptilian boogeyman stuff. Evil meetings in a forest with sacrifices. I'm sorry, it's just too out there for my taste.

Don't get me wrong, I suspect and can confirm lots of shady political issues...but come on now!

2006-09-10 17:05:33 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-10 16:58:21 · 8 answers · asked by me 6

Since this happened only a month into Clinton's first term in office, it could be said that G.W. Bush was too preoccupied with his re-election at a time that he should have been on top of this terrorist plot. As former Director of the CIA, one would have expected more from him. I think that in light of things, maybe all of this should lay squarely on the shoulders of Dubya's Daddy.

2006-09-10 16:53:13 · 20 answers · asked by edaem 4

That kind of movie would have to be 6 hours long. The first hour would be about Prescott Bush's connections to the Nazi's. The second hour would be about Reagan and Bush arming, training, financing Bin Laden and his boy's in the 80's. Then they'll switch it over to Bush and Reagan arming Saddam. Then the next scene will be how they armed the Taliban. Then they can close this phase of the movie by showing how Bush and Reagan wussed out and gave Iran weapons for hostages.

Then as the movie get's going they can show how the Saudi Royal family are best friends with the Bush's. The same Royal family with a history of supporting terrorism. Then they could show the investments in the Carlyle group the Bush's made with the Bin Ladens. Then near the end they can show Bush trying to hand over our port security to country's linked to terrorism.

And at the end you'll see the words EVER GET THE FEELING THE BIGGEST THREAT TO AMERICA ISN'T AL-QAEDA, BUT THE BUSH'S.

Would you buy a ticket?

2006-09-10 16:50:13 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

Out of respect for all those that lost their lives and their families... can we all just say a big prayer, and if you don't believe in that, just think about them and not spout of name calling or "bush planned 9/11 crap" or anything... Just for a day we should all come together as what we are... Americans... God Bless all on 9/11

2006-09-10 16:50:01 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-10 16:43:12 · 12 answers · asked by dstr 6

What the f--k is he trying to do? He was clearly complicit in the attack and now he is laying wreaths?

2006-09-10 16:37:12 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

So the Mounties charge 5 or 6 people mostly kids with terror - The Crown should be prosecuting them but when - ?

They seem to have disapeared anyone heard anything at all?

2006-09-10 16:33:43 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-10 16:31:21 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-10 16:30:10 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

How is the constitutional principle of federalism reflected in the formal amendment process?
Help Please.
Best Answer gets the points!

2006-09-10 16:27:03 · 3 answers · asked by Gui 2

If a proposed Amendment violates the Constitution, should the Supreme Court be able to block its ratification?
Please Help!!
Best answer gets the points!! Thanks..

2006-09-10 16:25:45 · 4 answers · asked by Gui 2

How do the formal and informal amendment processes compare as expressions of popular sovereingty???
Best answer by tonight wins the pts!!

Please Help.

2006-09-10 16:24:08 · 2 answers · asked by Gui 2

the Republicans proudly proclaim their party affiliation.

what do the Democrats have to hide?

Why are they concealing their party ties?

2006-09-10 16:19:36 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

Why is this?

http://www.cuttingedge.org/news/n1221.cfm

2006-09-10 16:19:02 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

these ideals include: equality, rights, liberty, democracy, and opportunity!

2006-09-10 16:18:29 · 9 answers · asked by imapastry 2

2006-09-10 16:17:17 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://money.cnn.com/2006/09/10/news/economy/gas_prices/index.htm?cnn=yes

2006-09-10 16:14:36 · 21 answers · asked by CPCFC 1

Will the Clinton death trail continue?

2006-09-10 16:07:36 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-10 16:04:11 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous

Please read this answer to a question regarding the lies told by the white house:

"oh, by the way......at least Clinton was being TOTALLY honest with the people when he stated 'on camera'......."I did not have sex with that woman"...........RIGHT???????"

All Clinton did was ruin a blue dress. The Bush administrtion is responsible for the deaths of tens of thousands of innocents. Do the two offenses actually compare?

2006-09-10 16:00:53 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

fedest.com, questions and answers