Politics - 9 September 2006

That doesnt matter. What if commit cheating, gang lies,cheating co-worker salarly, not paying taxes but hiding money . thats sins. What is sensible ? will it cover forever doing ? i dont know why .how other feel the money other doing?

2006-09-09 06:11:06 · 21 answers · asked by ketty n 1

2006-09-09 06:05:43 · 9 answers · asked by Hamid A 1

2006-09-09 06:02:16 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-09 06:01:50 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

I asked a similar question earlier but I think I phrased it incorrectly, so I'll try again: the original rule for the house of representitives was "The Number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty thousand", however the number of representitives became fixed at a rate of 435 in 1911, and currently we have one representitive for every 690,000 people. It seems to me that the forefathers of the country did not expect our country to get this big, and how can we justify watering down our democracy due to population increase?

2006-09-09 05:53:57 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

What is national language of the US and is it illegal for people not to know it, thanks

2006-09-09 05:53:00 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

Iran has no motive to attack the US and no ability to do so


But American governments want to attack Iran and not have to go through a new and updated Iran military to do it - They need a reason to nuke Iran


On Sept. 11 just before Bush gets to deliver his speech American personel will report that Iran has launched a missle tword Israel and that it has been shot down and returned an American made mini nuke killing tens of thousands

A small nuke will also be set off in the US but it will be planted by the US military

2006-09-09 05:45:23 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

we have as i think 172 countries in this world or maybe less soo why we dont make a new country with new econmie and new languge and our race is to be from every nation ? pc i love all people from all over the world to work togther

2006-09-09 05:44:26 · 8 answers · asked by loveman 1

The Dems were up in arms about the 1st Amendment when the New York Times published classified info. But now they want to control ABC because of "Pathway to 911". Hypocritical I think.

2006-09-09 05:39:32 · 9 answers · asked by LIL_TXN 4

2006-09-09 05:37:47 · 12 answers · asked by BadAdvice 3

2006-09-09 05:36:07 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

Since they (especially Cheney) support state sponsored torture in defiance of international treaties they're exposing our troops to the same. And I'm not just talking about this conflict, but all future ones as well.


Where's the outrage about this from all the "support the troops" people?

2006-09-09 05:35:48 · 22 answers · asked by Dastardly 6

I read that the Chinese,if this is true the United States is in grave danger.

2006-09-09 05:33:49 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

by signing the DO NOT CALL list bill?

2006-09-09 05:33:39 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

wondering when I should start doing my duty for my country and start gunning down Republicans.

2006-09-09 05:29:32 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

by spreading dis-information campaigns and lies (i.e. their latest example is this new 9-11 "mock-umentary")

by demanding importance be placed on, and lives be thrown away on, an illegal invasion of a country? (Iraq)

while allowing the most vile attacker of the US in her history to run off scot free (bin Laden)

_in essence they _aid_ and _abet_ the getaway of the 9-11 terrorists

has the GOP just tossed aside the final remnants of their guise of allegiance to America?

at least for the first time in the party's history they may be showing some signs of honesty at the very least!

2006-09-09 05:27:54 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

The founding fathers had no idea that our population would expand to 300 million and many could not have known that we would own so much land (from California to NY for instance). It seems to me that they set down a perfect government which would work for the relative size and population at that time, and maybe a doubling or tripling of that population, but...since then, the representational elements of the old system have been bent to mold to the ever increasing population which is now in the hundreds of millions...Would the forefathers approve? Take a look at this chart to get a better idea: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/02/Population_of_the_United_States%2C_1790-2000.png

2006-09-09 05:27:08 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

Like the Illegal Mexicans?
Like the US blacks?
Like the Chinese during the Clinton years?
Like our Jews?

Maybe I would be a better American if I would just keep repeating this "Bah, Bah, Bah, _______ good, Americans bad"?

2006-09-09 05:26:50 · 16 answers · asked by too K 2

I think it should be shown as is and let the people decide what they believe.

2006-09-09 05:26:06 · 9 answers · asked by Jean R 3

Iron Curtain Country China's growth is only projected one . Not Real one. is it correct ?

2006-09-09 05:20:30 · 13 answers · asked by adraya 2

If you question them, they respond back by saying you dont love your country, therefore scaring people into supporting their cause and agenda.

2006-09-09 05:20:28 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

They seem to be up his butt all the time. And making excuses for him.

2006-09-09 05:16:41 · 22 answers · asked by Ah Ha 4

...

2006-09-09 05:16:11 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-09 05:04:49 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

It feels great bursting libbies bubbles.

2006-09-09 05:00:35 · 10 answers · asked by Ah Ha 4

"WASHINGTON, Sept. 8 — The Central Intelligence Agency last fall repudiated the claim that there were prewar ties between Saddam Hussein’s government and an operative of Al Qaeda, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, according to a report issued Friday by the Senate Intelligence Committee.

The disclosure undercuts continuing assertions by the Bush administration that such ties existed, and that they provided evidence of links between Iraq and Al Qaeda. The Republican-controlled committee, in a second report, also sharply criticized the administration for its reliance on the Iraqi National Congress during the prelude to the war in Iraq."

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/09/world/middleeast/09intel.html?hp&ex=1157860800&en=6b11a9b2ce4125ad&ei=5094&partner=homepage

2006-09-09 04:58:59 · 18 answers · asked by Dastardly 6

Instead of electing an intelligent, respectable, experienced president, we elect one with "likeability" who can "connect with the people". Doe connecting with the average person have to mean that they ARE an average person?

Personally, I'd rather a President that doesn't give a *bleep* about me, but still gets the job done.

Are we going to elect another average Joe in '08, or are we going to elect a GOOD president?

For more info on eletist societies, please read 'The Republic' by Plato, as it was the cornerstone of American Law.

2006-09-09 04:58:02 · 8 answers · asked by Tofu Jesus 5

In which book does the scholar Ole Holsti says ," International relations theories act as pairs of colored sunglasses, allowing the wearer to see the only salient events relevant to the theory"? and in which year?

2006-09-09 04:47:18 · 1 answers · asked by Diplomat 1

2006-09-09 04:47:05 · 15 answers · asked by Ah Ha 4

2006-09-09 04:34:30 · 36 answers · asked by anonacoup 7