Politics - 2 September 2006

You may say we have a right reason to be in Iraq and that it is protecting our freedom. Fine. But it doesn't change the fact that Bush has made the war in Iraq the most important thing of his presidency. He has completely neglected us. Does it not matter to him that this country is billions of dollars in debt because he's spent it all on the war? What has he done for Hurricane Katrina victims, stem cell research, ridiculously high gas prices and poverty? Are these not more important than sending our 18 year olds to Iraq to die?

2006-09-02 04:21:38 · 17 answers · asked by Brackalicious 4

I've gotten some complaints that I am not asking a question. But the complainers do not seem too interested in the meaning of these words. How do we account for it? Is it universal that people do not like the meaning of words, or do these meanings disrupt the comfy semantic they thought and hoped the words had? Is obscurantism more prevalent among a particular political stripe?

2006-09-02 04:18:55 · 7 answers · asked by voltaire 3

Another example from the people so full of compassion, that they hold vigils for Murderers, rapists, serial killers, and lobsters, but find no problem with unlimited McAbortions to the tune of 2.5 million a year, and now, a documentary about murdering the president.

This follows in the fine tradition of Airhead America, who already did a radio version of assessinating the president.

Of course, liberals wouldn't dare do this for real murdering tyrants like Castro, Mugabi, Saddam, the Iranian Mullahs, the Chinese leadership, Kim Jung Il, Hugo Chavez. No Bush is much worse than them, so he deserves to be murdered. The others don't even garner as much as a letter writing campaign from the compassionate liberal

Bush assassinated? New film depicts it

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14608725/

For all of the dislike we have for Clinton and Carter, you won't find anything like this from conservative groups.

2006-09-02 04:18:46 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-02 04:16:54 · 7 answers · asked by dstr 6

2006-09-02 04:13:00 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-02 04:12:18 · 11 answers · asked by Truth 1

Here's what Dictionary.com says "liberal" means:
–adjective
1. favorable to progress or reform, as in political or religious affairs.
2. (often initial capital letter) noting or pertaining to a political party advocating measures of progressive political reform.
3. of, pertaining to, based on, or advocating liberalism.
4. favorable to or in accord with concepts of maximum individual freedom possible, esp. as guaranteed by law and secured by governmental protection of civil liberties.
5. favoring or permitting freedom of action, esp. with respect to matters of personal belief or expression: a liberal policy toward dissident artists and writers.
6. of or pertaining to representational forms of government rather than aristocracies and monarchies.
7. free from prejudice or bigotry; tolerant: a liberal attitude toward foreigners.
8. open-minded or tolerant, esp. free of or not bound by traditional or conventional ideas, values, etc.

2006-09-02 04:10:36 · 13 answers · asked by voltaire 3

Let us not be afraid of the meaning of words!!
Here is what Bartleby.com's dictionary says "liberal" means:

ADJECTIVE: 1a. Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas; free from bigotry. b. Favoring proposals for reform, open to new ideas for progress, and tolerant of the ideas and behavior of others; broad-minded. c. Of, relating to, or characteristic of liberalism. d. Liberal Of, designating, or characteristic of a political party founded on or associated with principles of social and political liberalism, especially in Great Britain, Canada, and the United States. 2a. Tending to give freely; generous: a liberal benefactor. b. Generous in amount. 3. Not strict or literal; loose or approximate: a liberal translation. 4. Of, relating to, or based on the traditional arts and sciences of a college or university curriculum: a liberal education

2006-09-02 04:01:29 · 18 answers · asked by voltaire 3

2006-09-02 03:58:46 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

How perverse? Good question!

The Far Left Wing ACLU Adoring Liberal Democrats NOW turn on and cannibalistically consume raw, one of their own " Sen. Lieberman" no less, that's about as sick as one can get!

The Far Left Wing ACLU Adoring Liberal Democrats dominate the majority of University faculties (those that can't do-teach) and the Kosher Valley (Hollywood) crowd fill their ranks.

BUT there is the great Heartland of America that is fed up with the perversity and Anti-American Bash Bush, Bash/Blame America rants and their policy re: the War on Terror which is to be Politically Correct and "Hug A Misunderstood Muslim Homocide Bomber".

They strive to erode traditional values like Christmas no less, a legitimate Federally recognized holiday by Congress and now to place a Lesbian in the Highest office of the land is just the tip of Iceberg!

How diseased? The patient is terminal.

Source(s):

The Far Left Wing Liberal Deomcrats: A Lost Cause
Chas. Abernat

2006-09-02 03:56:42 · 10 answers · asked by B'klyn Barracuda 3

2006-09-02 03:48:21 · 13 answers · asked by slyry75 3

2006-09-02 03:45:20 · 9 answers · asked by slyry75 3

2006-09-02 03:44:55 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-02 03:44:30 · 16 answers · asked by DAVID VUSI N 1

the work

2006-09-02 03:42:27 · 10 answers · asked by anger remain 1

2006-09-02 03:32:04 · 17 answers · asked by anger remain 1

2006-09-02 03:31:24 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-02 03:28:16 · 48 answers · asked by Dr MK Khaishagi 2

2006-09-02 03:22:58 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-02 03:22:08 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-02 03:13:57 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-02 03:01:45 · 24 answers · asked by Ebony 2

2006-09-02 03:01:13 · 26 answers · asked by Dr MK Khaishagi 2

I thought you morons said it was because of Bush?

2006-09-02 02:57:16 · 11 answers · asked by slyry75 3

And who started this lie?

2006-09-02 02:46:49 · 14 answers · asked by stephaniemariewalksonwater 5

Bush and his gal pals Harris and Coulter and all the religous right zealots feel that our country should only be guided by Christian principles.

I'm sure many don't realize why this could prove to be the downfall of our country now but shouldn't acknowledgment be paid for the value of this concept or is it too late?

2006-09-02 02:46:41 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

Why are indigent schizophrenics given major meds when they feel God guides them in their delusions but Bush isn't?

2006-09-02 02:43:09 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-02 02:40:28 · 22 answers · asked by SAHM/Part Time Tutor 4

I've seen a number of people here say that conservatives are more thoughtful and logical and liberals are more emotional and arbitrary. This seems like a male vs female stereotyping to me.

Aren't conservatives more likely to be people of faith rather than liberals who are more likely to believe in the logical origins of life (evolutinary explanation). Aren't conservatives emotional about abortion while liberals don't get up in arms about it. Aren't conservatives more likely to respond to the the emotion of fear whereas liberals stand for principles in the face of fear mongering?

Your thoughts please.

2006-09-02 02:40:20 · 6 answers · asked by Dastardly 6

is porn americas last great hoorah?

2006-09-02 02:38:40 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous