Politics - 26 August 2006

2006-08-26 17:18:10 · 12 answers · asked by ast5792 1

Emanuel Golstien = Osama
FBI / Homeland security = Big brother

Double think the thought police perpetual war nifty slogans the 2 min of hate etc

You and I get to be Winston and Jullia oh great?

2006-08-26 17:11:28 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

It is true that the very existence of Israel is totally dependent on the unconditional support and sponsorship of the US government as a super power. Additionally, many key Arab countries (such as Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Egypt) are ruled by regimes which allied themselves with the US for the sole reason of securing their thrones and dictatorships. All it takes is for the US government to suspend its unconditional support to Israel for some reason (very unlikely), or one or more of the US-friendly regimes being overthrown by a more patriotic anti-israeli ones (very likely) and Israel will be in big trouble! Imagine if five or six Arab countries attack Israel at once, or if Saudi Arabia initiates an oil embargo on the US like it did in 1976, or a combination of both, how long can israel last for?

2006-08-26 16:59:26 · 12 answers · asked by y w 1

osama was cornered and the US let him go.......thx W

2006-08-26 16:56:00 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

i lost it

i cant find it

im calling 911 for help

how about u?

2006-08-26 16:52:09 · 16 answers · asked by HellBoY 1

Every Fri nite question. Let's play!

2006-08-26 16:42:33 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

I oppose Gun “Control” for the same reason I oppose Drug “Control.”

The War on Drugs and the War on Guns have both led to increases in violent crime rates, because both create a black market. (Yes, I have statistics proving this.)

Gun “Control” did not stop Columbine, just as Prohibition does not stop drug use or alcohol use. Gun “Control” disarms innocent civilians, but does nothing to stop criminals (who don’t obey the law anyway) from acquiring guns on the black market. The laws against drugs artificially drive up their price, thus encouraging inner-city youth to drop out of school and join gangs, wherein they can make a huge profit. But gangs have turf-wars, and shoot-outs. You never see Budweiser having shoot-outs with Jack Daniels.

A truly free-market solution is to decriminalize all guns and drugs, thus taking them out of the black market. Violent crime rates will then drop.

So, I ask you, are you a hypocrite who opposes one yet supports the other? If so, why?

2006-08-26 16:37:06 · 16 answers · asked by Alexander S. Peak 1

After watching Democrats fail to capitalize on ANY of the myriad weaknesses of the Republican party in 2004, I realized that they had not, as an entity, sufferered enough losses to learn their lesson and become competitive. It remains to be seen if the Democratic party is CAPABLE of adapting, or if they will be replaced by another Party that rises to fill the considerable vacuum created by a monstrously corrupt ruling Party (Republicans) and a monstrously inept opposition Party (Democrats), which has left Americans WANTING a Government that still gives a damn about Americans.

2006-08-26 16:31:04 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

You can't have it both ways. You either believe in private property rights, or you are NOT a capitalist. There is no middle-ground between the two.

Laissez-faire capitalism advances the belief that any law against flag burning is not only a law against free speech, but is also a law against private property rights. If I own a flag (or Qu’ran, or Bible, or house, or marijuana, or whatever), it is MY private property, and I should be free to burn it, AS LONG as I don’t infringe upon anybody else's property rights in the process, according to capitalism.

So my question is this: are you a capitalist who opposes laws against flag-burning, or an America-hating commie? :)

(Personally, I'm a pretty hard-core capitalist: I oppose ALL forms of slavery, including taxation. But that's just me.)

2006-08-26 16:17:19 · 11 answers · asked by Alexander S. Peak 1

Am I the only one in here that seems to notice that # 1 Liberal is not liberal. He or she seems to lack a lot of knowlegde about a lot of topics. I'm confused about there actual agenda in here. Ignorance of an issue doesn't make you a liberal It only makes you ignorant!

2006-08-26 16:09:05 · 8 answers · asked by ? 3

I have recently left the Republican party to become an independent and am curious about other parties out there, especially ones who would like to reduce the size of government. I like a lot of their view points, but am a little concerned about the Constitution Party's isolation stance.

2006-08-26 16:07:59 · 8 answers · asked by AZ Ian 2

Don't we really want a smart president so he can make the best decisions?

2006-08-26 16:03:16 · 17 answers · asked by southco2001 2

yahoo removed my question because it conained official links to a site discussing bush's trial!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

(americans cannot access these sites from the u.s. because bush doesn't want them knowing!!!!!!!!!!!!)

2006-08-26 16:01:33 · 15 answers · asked by sikn_shadow_420 3

will Global Warming ever become a factor toconsider for voters in America?

2006-08-26 15:59:33 · 15 answers · asked by Piffle 4

Tell us about your community

2006-08-26 15:55:49 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

Isn't that progressive! It that just a natural desire to have two gay parents! I wished everyone was as open-minded as all liberals!

2006-08-26 15:38:54 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-08-26 15:35:03 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous

and why do americans not throw bush out of office before he kills more americans?

2006-08-26 15:30:34 · 23 answers · asked by bush-deathgrip 1

Or should I repent of my sins?

2006-08-26 15:30:23 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

We're all human...we all want the same basic things...so why all the hatred?---from both sides.

2006-08-26 15:28:41 · 24 answers · asked by loubean 5

would you or would you not support a group of liberals demonstrating by burning the American flag?

2006-08-26 15:24:20 · 19 answers · asked by shut up dummy 6

2006-08-26 15:24:17 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

If any other leader of any other nation or country did half of what george w bush has done he would be shot or tried as a war criminal. Why is george bush so arrogant that he feels it's his duty to govern a country that doesnt want him there. Does he think 9/11 was a thank you letter for what he did to iraq?

2006-08-26 15:22:23 · 21 answers · asked by ? 3

I don't see it that way, even though some would like me to believe it...I don't see hatred between people of different ideologies in the US...at least not the majority...how about you?

2006-08-26 15:21:54 · 12 answers · asked by loubean 5

sympathy?

2006-08-26 15:15:25 · 12 answers · asked by BiCUBIC 2

2006-08-26 15:15:16 · 7 answers · asked by carl_roper2006 1

are we united or divided? What happened to America first?

2006-08-26 15:13:15 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

Choices are:
1 - George W Bush, Junior / America
2 - Dick Cheney, America
3 - Kim JDaw ill / xxx
4 - IranKim Dae-jung's / N Korea
5 - Mahmoud Ahmadinejad / Iran
6 - Hu Jintao / China
7 - Hillary Rodham Clinton / NY
8 - Michael Jackson / Not Avail
9 - Ehud Olmert / Israel
10 - The Pope Of Rome, Joseph Ratzinger

2006-08-26 15:08:36 · 19 answers · asked by skystriker65 3

2006-08-26 15:07:18 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

I was stationed over there and learned that the North has 1.5 million troops at the border ready to attack at the drop of a dime. I also learned they have enough artillery to keep a sustained rate of fire for 3 days straight. I know they don't have much of an airforce, and Kim Jung Il is crazy. Launching those missiles on July 4th this past year really got me concerned. The South Koreans act as if they are not that big of a threat, and the U.S tries to avoid any battles with them. I saw on CNN the other day that the North's troops were making faces at the South's of all things. Does the North know something we don't? Why are they so confident?

2006-08-26 15:03:24 · 11 answers · asked by lvillejj 4