Politics - 17 August 2006

Isen't a great book!! Didn't it open your eyes to the Liberal agenda.

2006-08-17 11:22:31 · 15 answers · asked by kookie 3

20 years from now, one will be watching the History Channel, which will educate and portray, how the evil Bush administration went on a wild goose chase around the world performing exorcisms on suspected anti-American nations, how tapping into Christian fundamentalist mindset, they achieved the green light for aggressive American overseas extremism, not forgetting the massacre of countless thousands of innocent civilians. History Channel will reveal to us, how Bush, with his party of cowboys, were hell bent on world dominance, controlling the worlds resources by elaborate lies, and silencing the people of the west by playing them a movie, a movie of the boogey man (laden) shown across the west, every time we happened to wake up from our deep hypnosis and sniffed something wasn’t right or iffy.

That day will come, and soon enough!!!

2006-08-17 11:22:06 · 14 answers · asked by BT 1

THIS seems like justice does it not .IF Israel refuses to pay then the world should stop dealing with them .
We rebuilt Japan and Germany spent millions in korea and vietnam Infact we always rebuild what we blow up .SO will Israel do the same or will america be forced to .

2006-08-17 11:21:23 · 9 answers · asked by playtoofast 6

Today, a judge declared the warrentless wiretapping done by the Bush Administration as being unconstitutional. But to what end?

The Bush Administration has had many of THEIR OWN lawyers say that it is perfectly legal. While everyone in the world knows that's a crock. It violates the US constitution.

Here's what Bush will do if the appeals fail to overturn that decision. He will get on TV and say, "Ok, we won't do any more warrentless wiretaps". At the same time, he will be writing one of his Signature Statements that says he can ignore that law if he so chooses - and now it's legal for him to do so.

He has signed over 750 of these Signature Statements to ignore the laws. The previous record was around 100. It is quite clear that he will do whatever he wants. If you show him it is illegal, he will just do a signature statement. It is quite obvious he believes he is above the law and not part of it.

Why is it so tough to get a warrent? He had his own judges on hand.

2006-08-17 11:19:54 · 17 answers · asked by drizzt_234 3

that thoughy we should leave hitler alone the mc carthy files they hated

2006-08-17 11:18:15 · 5 answers · asked by kendiane 3

quote >>>August 16th, 2006 at 12:58:20


Plame team to force Cheney, Rove testm.

Reuters

LOS ANGELES, Aug 15 (Reuters) - A lawyer plans to use a legal precedent that allowed President Bill Clinton to be sued while in office to force Vice President Dick Cheney and presidential adviser Karl Rove to testify in a lawsuit brought by former CIA operative Valerie Plame and her husband.

California attorney Joseph Cotchett said he will ask a federal court to order Cheney, his ex-chief of staff Lewis "Scooter" Libby and Rove to testify in depositions about their role in disclosing her classified status.
<<
http://www.rawstory.com/comments/18152.html

don't believe it? please give facts or links to back up your arguments...or just bail out ... spreading insults don't make you a winner -quite the opposite, in fact.

2006-08-17 11:17:59 · 5 answers · asked by omnimog 4

Besides the right to burn flags, to give child molesters the right to sit in parks, to take away all Christians the right to display the Nativity scene , to rid the world of the 10 commandments, etc so on

2006-08-17 11:14:52 · 26 answers · asked by itsallover 5

We pull all of our ships and people home close the embassey's and ask all americans abroad to return .
Then we issue a statement that we will no longer bother with the world and our borders are closed for good .TAKE all foriegn investments and money and divide it among all americans who have less then a million bucks of assets .that would be a check for around 35,000 per person . I say lets do it .

2006-08-17 11:14:14 · 10 answers · asked by playtoofast 6

2006-08-17 11:08:53 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

if there was a UN during hitlers regime and they let him regroup would he have given his soldiers more food and gas to regroup and go on to conquer the world i think yes

2006-08-17 11:08:33 · 7 answers · asked by kendiane 3

Think about it, if we had all conservatives, we would be a facist leaning society. On the other hand, if we had all liberals, it would be a more communist leaning society. Don't get me wrong, I'm a conservative, and I believe this. The reason I call myself one is because I find myself in conjunction with them the majority of the time.

2006-08-17 11:06:43 · 17 answers · asked by Jason 1

The US, UK and Israel are raciest countries pure and simple. They pretend they are democracies with equal justice for all but that is nothing more than words on a piece of paper and utterances from politicians. America's history is rife with racism (see Native Americans, African Americans) so too the UK to (see Indians, Catholics) and the Israelis (Palestinians). Much of the policies of this Axis of evil are greased by both racism and greed. At least the Nazis were certifiably evil and proud of it. They never invoked God, liberty and democracy in their atrocities.

Like Abraham Lincoln stated in 1860:

"I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretence of loving liberty -- to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocrisy."

2006-08-17 10:59:23 · 26 answers · asked by BT 1

Since Joe Lieberman decided to run as an independent, he's leading in the polls by double digits. What's that all about? Are Democrats confused?

2006-08-17 10:57:48 · 13 answers · asked by sacolunga 5

this is what bush was doing.. the wire taps violates the separation of powers doctrine, the Administrative Procedures Act, the First and Fourth amendments to the United States Constitution, the FISA and Title III....Republicans can talk about freedom all day long...but it takes a Democrat to enforce the rule of Law...I raise my glass to this brave judge!!!

2006-08-17 10:53:35 · 18 answers · asked by tough as hell 3

What makes you think that it can't be used to ignore the 2nd amendment?

p.s.
guns don't do much against tanks, missles and a well trained blacops group.

2006-08-17 10:41:55 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

Peace doves are fair game for Bush and Blair?

2006-08-17 10:40:53 · 13 answers · asked by BT 1

After seeing so amny small wars, crusades and coalitions againt "terrorism" I wonder whether we really can win through military might. For example, our country (UK) followed Americas latest military action in Iraq. We were followed a swift end to "Weapons of mass destruction", yet we are still loosing troops in Basra, and Baghdad. If we look back to northern Ireland, or the situations in the Balkans, it should be clear that our current tactics do not work, and only lead to more hatred and more insurgents.

At the moment we shoot terrorists, and often civillians in the process. These mistakes allow radical people to brew hatred and fear within the minds of young people. It is this which causes even more terrorists to appear, attacking more of our landmarks and cities, which in turn fuels our "crusades" against terror.

This is a cycle that has run for centuries and will continue to run unless we break it. We need to break the source of the problem. Do you agree?

2006-08-17 10:40:51 · 22 answers · asked by Kieran B 1

I'm tired of having a draft dodger for a president , I hope to God that John Mcain enters and wins the primaries in 2008.

2006-08-17 10:34:08 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

I sure hope the ACLU and Liberals everywhere are happy now!! Bush tries to protect us with wire tapping in suspected terror cells, and ohhhh WE CANT DO THAT GEORGE!! Unless you are a terrorist , this shouldnt of bothered you at all.. fools...

2006-08-17 10:25:38 · 21 answers · asked by itsallover 5

You give up one right ( illegal wiretapping) and it just leads to more and more and more.

2006-08-17 10:23:16 · 12 answers · asked by Charles Dobson Focus on the Fam 2

according to many surveys israel was a big looser

2006-08-17 10:21:26 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://articles.news.aol.com/news/_a/bush-hops-on-a-harley-for-economic/20060816161209990004?ncid=NWS00010000000001

He's trying to look cool and having fun...while our troops are dying in Iraq...

2006-08-17 10:20:24 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

With their extremist views on World Affairs.

2006-08-17 10:17:41 · 22 answers · asked by BT 1

His inability to speak even when the speech is prepared by another idiot.Mind you the Uk has one to in the form of a Mr John Prescott.But really is George W Bush material for such an important position.We await the arrival of the first woman President.Dont beleive all this then go to youtube.com

2006-08-17 10:17:39 · 21 answers · asked by realdolby 5

Oh, and countries that owe their existence to, or have been saved/liberated by the USA throughout history don't count since they wouldn't exist if it weren't for the U.S.

2006-08-17 10:11:37 · 41 answers · asked by TLJaguar 3

2006-08-17 10:08:52 · 11 answers · asked by crazypo_po 1

Judge nixes warrantless surveillance

thats what the headline said. Federal judge ruled the warrantless wiretapping was unconstitutional. An it invaded our right to free speach and violated our privacy.
Score one of many victories to come for the Dems!!

2006-08-17 10:08:38 · 21 answers · asked by Charles Dobson Focus on the Fam 2

2006-08-17 10:05:31 · 32 answers · asked by Big Al 1

lets great the world we want overnight and release a deadly viruse that will kill everyone not innoculated to prevent death .THEn report how millions are dying in america . this way we look inocent and blame it on the terrorists .

2006-08-17 10:03:58 · 38 answers · asked by playtoofast 6

2006-08-17 10:00:22 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous