English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics - 9 August 2006

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Politics

0

if israel decide not to stop fire and keep destroying village after village and building after building( they say still need one month at least) keeping us living in the fear of dying under the walls of our houses or on roads while crossing bridges or ... would all the world stay quiet watching us like an american movie...

2006-08-09 04:17:52 · 3 answers · asked by ? 2

Despite all sensible advice Bush has managed to plunge the world into certain major conflict, whilst Blair is bending over backways to please him. These questions need to be asked.

2006-08-09 04:08:36 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

what is the biggest threat to America : Zionism or Neoconservatism ?

2006-08-09 04:07:24 · 17 answers · asked by Pres. Chimp 2

Lots of Palestinians have lived in these refugee camps all their lives. Are they allowed to travel throughout Lebanon or Syria without restrictions. Are they allowed to get a job. Do they pay taxes to Leb/Syria or not? How do those host countries treat them?

2006-08-09 04:00:17 · 4 answers · asked by Brand X 6

do i have the right to fly my flag the way i want to.....yes or no

2006-08-09 04:00:16 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

will Lieberman now try to run for a seat in Israel's Parliament ? or get a job pushing papers at Halliburton ?

2006-08-09 03:57:07 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-08-09 03:51:17 · 2 answers · asked by johnnydean86 4

Another money making war me thinks. Is there no end to this man's quests for money.

2006-08-09 03:51:09 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

did CONNECTICUT voters stand up to the cancer of Zionism last night by dumping Israel's handpuppet Lieberman ?

2006-08-09 03:48:59 · 16 answers · asked by Pres. Chimp 1

is ZIONIST NEOKON Joe Lieberman on the phone right now with Karl Rove getting his instructions for November ?

2006-08-09 03:46:49 · 8 answers · asked by Pres. Chimp 1

2006-08-09 03:33:54 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

The rules of POLITICAL CORRECTNESS when it comes to the Israeli-Arab conflict:

1. In the Middle East, it is always the Arabs that attack first, and it's always Israel who defends itself. This is called "Retaliation".
2. The Arabs, whether Palestinians or Lebanese, are not allowed to kill Israelis. This is called "Terrorism"
3. Israel has the right to kill Arab civilians, this is called "Self-Defense", or these days "Collateral Damage".
4. When Israel kills too many civilians. The Western world calls for restraint. This is called the "Reaction of the International Community".
5. Palestinians and Lebanese do not have the right to capture Israeli military, not even a limited number, not even 1 or 2. This is called "Kidnapping".
6. Israel has the right to capture as many Palestinians as they want (Palestinians: around 10000 to date, 300 of which are children, Lebanese: 1000s to date, being held without trial).There is no limit; there is no need for proof of guilt or trial.

2006-08-09 03:32:19 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

is ZIONIST NEOKON Joe Lieberman going to quit ?

2006-08-09 03:31:18 · 8 answers · asked by Pres. Chimp 1

As a brit i'm quite frustrated that we don't join the EU properly. After visiting France i'm becoming more aware that the british public is being kept in the dark about joining Europe. Do you think a united europe is a good idea and do you think its a realistic possibility?

2006-08-09 03:23:49 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

It started with stingy Northern businesses moving plants to the South to take advantage of cheaper, more docile labor that wouldn't unionize to save their souls. Then people started moving there from devastated Northern areas for the jobs. The population shift gave the South more voting strength in Congress, so power has shifted to the Far Right.

In addition, such noxious cultural expressions as country music, NASCAR, and Fundamentalism have spread beyond their Southern base and infected the rest of the country.

In order to protect our way of life, should the North-- from Minnesota to Maine and down to Maryland-- secede from the Union? And maybe the West Coast be independent as well?

The South cannot object, since they tried secession before and still resent getting beat in the Civil War. This would enable them to have the Confederate Dystopia they always wanted. Maybe they can bring back slavery and minstrel shows.

2006-08-09 03:19:02 · 9 answers · asked by kreevich 5

2006-08-09 03:12:25 · 7 answers · asked by judgemartiniz 5

Around the world?

2006-08-09 03:12:10 · 21 answers · asked by Kookoo Bananas 3

2006-08-09 03:07:16 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

I'm not from the US, so sorry if my intrusion into your politics offends, but I just wanted to say that Al Gore is the only politician I've seen (from the US, UK, anywhere) who says exactly what I think, and have been thinking.

From his election campaign in 2000, to his criticism of Iraq policy before the war, to his comments on Springsteens website, to his latest film, pretty much everything I've seen him say/write has been in tune with the way I feel.

I've always hated politicians, but Al is the only exception I've seen. If you guys in the US don't want him to run in 2008, can we please import him over here to Britain, to take down Blair?

How do other feel about Al?

2006-08-09 03:04:13 · 12 answers · asked by pantocool 1

North Korea asks South for flood help

2006-08-09 02:58:08 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

Liberals want to discuss everyting and over analyze. I believe that is were we are getting in trouble. I say we fight. boxer and cheney are oposed to each others opinion, CAGE MATCH. i am tired of talkin around in circles with some dumb **** liberal. I saw we kick our ideas into there heads. If you win your write if you lose your wrong. easy huh play ground rules servival of the strongest. what do you think?

2006-08-09 02:57:16 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-08-09 02:54:31 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-08-09 02:48:43 · 13 answers · asked by itsallover 5

Who do you think has the better system for the people of the country. e.g. do you think the US citizens have a better way of life than the British or visa versa.

2006-08-09 02:33:22 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

do you think we might have one of these as president someday?

2006-08-09 02:29:44 · 57 answers · asked by kere_beros 1

And it seems to have been that way for ever. Look at Vietnam, Irak and now Lebanon, look at all the real major conflicts where guerillas have gone stronger and stronger, defeating the strongest "official" armies and governments. Ultimately they always win, one way or another.
And I am not talking terrorism even if they associates sometimes in our modern world, so let's try to stay focused on guerilla itself. What do you make of that ?

2006-08-09 02:29:22 · 5 answers · asked by benao62 2

And that's why he lost the Primary? He suffered the wrath of the DEMOCRATIC PARTY!!

2006-08-09 02:25:57 · 14 answers · asked by Kookoo Bananas 3

The biggest threat I see facing our nation today is not terrorism, it is "liberalism." The left wishes to see America’s destruction, by unraveling everything that our ancestors fought and died for. It is a sort of death wish, which is why talk host Michael Savage calls it a mental disease, and I agree. This country, like Rome, will fall from within, because of the vast hatred for America that the left has beat into the minds of our youth. We need to understand that there are people inside our country who hate America, who wish America to fall to its knees. They include every left wing radical that attacks our schools, family, faith and military.

2006-08-09 02:24:44 · 16 answers · asked by BrianKSE2006 3

fedest.com, questions and answers