Other - Politics & Government - September 2006

If so, THEY ARE CRAZY!

2006-09-26 09:41:50 · 19 answers · asked by Urntrede frdtrut 2

and how many lies have Bush told?

2006-09-26 09:38:53 · 15 answers · asked by Urntrede frdtrut 2

2006-09-26 09:38:02 · 12 answers · asked by DEEJay 4

Do you think they will go back UP after the voting is over? You bet they will so people be very weary,cause we're in for one Hell of a ride..

2006-09-26 09:37:34 · 13 answers · asked by GreenEYED Beauty 3

2006-09-26 09:36:54 · 7 answers · asked by tyfalloutboy 2

I've googled "President Clinton's office", and can't find any contact information. I want to send an email to him - can someone help?

2006-09-26 09:32:13 · 9 answers · asked by Diana E 1

One, your enemy can surrender. Two, you can take away your enemy will to fight. Three, you can take away the resources of you enemy so they can not afford to fight. Now are we doing any of the three to win this war on Terror?

2006-09-26 09:31:18 · 7 answers · asked by DEEJay 4

and now they are yelling that he didn't do enough?

Republicans said that attacking Osama was just a gesture to divert America's attention? Did they think Osama wasn't a threat worthy of attack?

how can you yell "he should've done more"... when you mocked his attempts when he did try originally?

2006-09-26 09:31:02 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-26 09:17:44 · 17 answers · asked by tannerman_07 2

2006-09-26 09:15:10 · 11 answers · asked by alice b 6

2006-09-26 09:14:06 · 6 answers · asked by lauren k 2

2006-09-26 09:12:52 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

** They wear no uniforms
** They hide behind woman and children
** They are not FAIR to us (beheadings and kidnappings)
** They love our liberals and talk just like them

I do not want them TORTURED - but they do not deseve special "rights", as they are not rational human beings.

2006-09-26 08:51:06 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-26 08:39:24 · 8 answers · asked by Freedom 1

2006-09-26 08:31:12 · 17 answers · asked by jay d 2

2006-09-26 08:16:26 · 18 answers · asked by Mrs..Yahoo 3

The radioactivity of exploded Depleted Uranium munitions used in Iraq during this second Iraq war is the equivalent of 250,000 Nagasaki Atomic Bombs. This is from a paper presented at the ‘World Uranium Conference Weapons Conference’ in October 2003 which stated that "calculated that 800 tons of DU is the atomicity equivalent to 83,000 Nagasaki bombs. The amount of DU used in Iraq is equivalent to 250,000 Nagasaki bombs. Professor Yagasaki affirmed that DU shells are atrocious radioactive weapons which should not be used ; and that DU has a long life of 4.5 billion years remaining in the soil , air ,water in all affected zones."

Still support Bush using nuclear warfare against innocent civilians in a country that never attacked us and never could have or would have attacked us?

2006-09-26 08:02:56 · 15 answers · asked by corwynwulfhund 3

“This might all be ancient history if the spectre of Supply Side economics had not reared its ugly head again once Bush II took office. In selling his $1.6 trillion tax cut-half of which went to the wealthiest 1% of Americans-Bush promised in 2001 that it would produce 800,000 new jobs. In fact, the economy has lost 2.7 million jobs since Bush took office, again, the worst economic performance since the Great Depression.
The effects of Bush's tax cut on the deficit and debt are exactly what we would expect having seen Reagan's results-only worse. Bush inherited from Clinton a fiscal surplus of $127 billion. In his first year he turned that into a deficit of $158 billion. In this, his second year, he will run a deficit of over $400 billion-a swing to the worse of over $600 billion in only two years.
Now Bush has sold us on still another megadose of this same Supply Side voodoo. Two thirds of his new $350 billion tax cut will go to the top 10% of income earners. Bush's Congressional ally, Tom DeLay, promises more such cuts for every year Bush is in office.
The long term effects of these policies are profoundly damaging. When Bush took office, the government's ten year surplus was forecast to total $5.6 trillion. This was critical to building fiscal soundness as the Baby Boomers begin to retire.
Now, the ten year forecast projects a cumulative deficit of $1.1 trillion, a net loss of $6.7 trillion in only two years. With the exception of World Wars, this is the greatest, most rapid destruction of public wealth in the history of the world.”

http://www.counterpunch.org/freeman05302003.html

2006-09-26 08:02:23 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://video.yahoo.com/video/play?ei=UTF-8&p=the+towers+falling&b=6&oid=6aa93214bcac5bbc&rurl=www.harlemonline.com&vdone=http%3A%2F%2Fvideo.yahoo.com%2Fvideo%2Fsearch%3Fei%3DUTF-8%26p%3Dthe%2Btowers%2Bfalling
Now ink to this question and look at what implosion looks like . http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Aovblf3VjBrzapthc1OPI_zzy6IX?qid=20060926110735AAV74ir

2006-09-26 07:38:09 · 9 answers · asked by Tommy G. 5

The reason I ask is; one always needs to look at who had the most to gain by the event. At that time congress was debating cutting off all aid to Isaeral, the UN was debating sanctions against her, for the slaughter of palasintinas who would hurl rocks at tanks. Immeaditly after 911 those issues were drooped and a major amrs deal wioth them by us was made. hummmmmmmm

2006-09-26 07:34:54 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-26 07:23:37 · 9 answers · asked by Ricky m 1

are fighting for your freedoms? You ask such stupid, hateful questions because you think that you are making digs at the President. It's direspectful to my nephew and the other men and women that have the guts to go stand up for the rights of ALL American citizens. So remember the next time you make a smart *** remark about the President it's not him you are really cutting down, it's the people who are fighting for your rights.

2006-09-26 07:21:46 · 20 answers · asked by Only hell mama ever raised 6

2006-09-26 07:20:13 · 12 answers · asked by MARK C 1

http://www.phillyblast.com/HollanderRidge/hrt-prep.htm
http://video.yahoo.com/video/play?p=explosive+demolition&ei=UTF-8&b=8&oid=24e3185415d944aa&rurl=www.dykon-explosivedemolition.com&vdone=http%3A%2F%2Fvideo.yahoo.com%2Fsearch%2Fvideo%3Fp%3Dexplosive%2Bdemolition%26ei%3DUTF-8
http://video.yahoo.com/video/play?p=explosive+demolition&ei=UTF-8&b=15&oid=6d6010cd7427c46e&rurl=www.eurodecommissioning.co.uk&vdone=http%3A%2F%2Fvideo.yahoo.com%2Fvideo%2Fsearch%3Fp%3Dexplosive%2Bdemolition%26ei%3DUTF-8%26b%3D11
Notice what has to be done to a building to prep it to fall.
Note that in each case the building goes from bottom up not top down.

2006-09-26 07:07:35 · 16 answers · asked by Tommy G. 5

notice how that question is worded,be careful how you answer
come on people show me you are intelligent!!!!!!

2006-09-26 07:05:27 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

This has nothing to do with conspiracy theories,so to all who want to go down that route,FORGET IT!
The reason I ask this is because in the the initial aftermath OBL was blamed by the American administration but denied any direct involvement and praised the people who planned and carried out this despicable act.
Surely he would have been pleased to be able to claim responsibility for this
"Strike against the evil Americans" (not my opinion).
Have the US been looking for the wrong man?

2006-09-26 07:05:07 · 32 answers · asked by rosbif 6

Sorry about the weird question, my dad wants to know. Why? Don't ask.

2006-09-26 07:00:52 · 14 answers · asked by Rosie 2

2006-09-26 06:59:41 · 3 answers · asked by gullible 1

i have an opinion, i think Osama bin Laden is only a character, created by US goverment, like a decoy..whom appeared as a muslim and admitted to be the leader for 9/11 attack. that's why he has never been found..so US have reasons to attack Afghanistan and Iraq and also tarnishing muslim's image as the terrorist..

now, they made up stories to end it all by spreading news that Osama was dead. is this might be? what do you think.

2006-09-26 06:59:38 · 17 answers · asked by James Bond 5

2006-09-26 06:48:38 · 6 answers · asked by someone 1