Other - Politics & Government - August 2006

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=707&e=3&u=/060804/photos_en/2006_08_04t032706_450x357_us_moore

2006-08-04 13:15:00 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

back in like the 80's gas was 1.50 now it's 3.00 pretty soon it may be 5.50 a gallon! don't you think thats a little pricey? What should the gov. do about this? Thats way most people are riding bikes almost everywhere to save cash on gas! I may be only 11 but I know some of the isuess! <<< I think I may have spelled that wrong! oops!

2006-08-04 13:06:09 · 40 answers · asked by brunett_sailor_moon 1

2006-08-04 13:03:08 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

Considering that Geroge Bush has sullied the image of can-do rah-rah, score more points and hold-'em team mantra?

2006-08-04 12:42:25 · 12 answers · asked by cowhandy2 1

2006-08-04 12:38:01 · 8 answers · asked by D 2

Saddam Hussein is sentenced? Or would you rather be in the crowd to cheer or boo?

2006-08-04 12:35:55 · 10 answers · asked by Crooks Gap 5

2006-08-04 12:20:14 · 13 answers · asked by Suliman 3

Im not talking about just beleiving in something, I am talking about beleiving to the extent that you are willing to go protest, march or take other forms of action.

2006-08-04 12:19:16 · 6 answers · asked by korn_issues_29 3

I think Hillary Clinton.

2006-08-04 12:16:22 · 12 answers · asked by Suliman 3

2006-08-04 12:15:55 · 29 answers · asked by cognito44 3

2006-08-04 12:15:05 · 32 answers · asked by cognito44 3

I know it is a small thing but here in Canada citizens can write to their federal politicians and the Prime Minister by throwing a letter into the mail with no stamp. This encourages everyone to let the politician know how you feel and think about issues. Does the United States have a similar system? No wise cracks about the cost of postage please, for some it does matter. This is only true for Federal politicians, provincial politicians can only be contacted by mail with stamps.

2006-08-04 12:13:46 · 7 answers · asked by Mr. PDQ 4

To solve all the problems. Offered more jobs at great wages. is they did this americans would be trying to get over the boarder into mexico.

2006-08-04 12:11:54 · 14 answers · asked by jackpack 3

2006-08-04 12:09:38 · 9 answers · asked by cognito44 3

2006-08-04 12:05:07 · 31 answers · asked by cognito44 3

2006-08-04 12:04:46 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

Too many innocent children and people are dying in the middle east everyday. Politicians tend to brush off this as collateral damage and acceptable in a fight against terrorists; unfortunate, but acceptable. Is this right and/or moral?

2006-08-04 11:56:42 · 17 answers · asked by looooboooo 1

The Republican party is attempting to raise the minimum wage level but is tying it to a tax break for the rich. Aired on News Hour tonight. This is a marriage of bills in which the two must be taken together as a whole. In order for the minimum wage to be increased the tax break for the rich must be attached to it in order to become law.

2006-08-04 11:55:17 · 11 answers · asked by Mr. PDQ 4

Don't get 'Edna on me'.
Here's a definition:

An ownership interest in the minerals contained in a particular parcel of land, with or without ownership of the surface of the land. The owner of mineral rights is usually entitled to either take the minerals from the land himself or receive a royalty from the party that actually extracts the minerals.

So that means I own the surface of the soil and above. But not too far, because there is some Gov. Air space that's not mine, in the sky.

2006-08-04 11:50:51 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

Why is there no memorial at the WTC yet? Don't you think it is about time?

2006-08-04 11:25:53 · 12 answers · asked by Teslajuliet 4

In the early 1940's President Truman insisted that Great Britain allow the creation of the State of Israel w/in the UK's Palestinian territory. He did this w/out considering that the US would be a far better place for an Israeli State to co-exist with America's secular system (as, for example, The Amish do) and certainly better than the worst area possible. The UK (wrecked and bankrupted by WW2) effectively had no choice.
Before the majority of the world's oil supplies go up in smoke and we potentially see the build up of alliances potentially leading to WW3, should the US with all it's land and empty space insist that rather than fighting to keep Israel in a part of the world that is becoming untenable for them to continue living in we give them a choice of moving to virgin US. land or fighting their own war?
http://www.trumanlibrary.org/israel/palestin.htm

2006-08-04 11:05:56 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

Do you think all Muslims in Iraq, Afghanistan, Kashmir or elsewhere are terrorists? if so, why?

2006-08-04 11:04:06 · 38 answers · asked by Valentino 3

Why not just go back to your home lands where they study your religion and have your customs. I'm not talking to those that were born here I'm talking about transplant americans that are unhappy with being here..

2006-08-04 11:02:21 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-08-04 10:40:52 · 6 answers · asked by Windsor 2

With Lady Liberty holding her freedom tourch out over the harbor and the National Guard Patrolling the border?

2006-08-04 10:37:17 · 15 answers · asked by Retarded Dave 5

Or in our lifetime?

2006-08-04 10:18:48 · 10 answers · asked by Mikethegolfer 2

2006-08-04 10:13:53 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-08-04 10:10:02 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-08-04 09:55:54 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

how could you like him rich people will stand up for rich people just wondering with all respect ryan

2006-08-04 09:54:57 · 29 answers · asked by wwefreak36 1